SCOTUS vs. Montana: News and Links

Breaking stories and some context on the Supreme Court’s block of Montana’s ban on corporate political spending. Please share links you find in the comments! And make sure you SIGN THE PETITION to stand with Montana!

 

Hat tip to Howard Bashman and the HowAppealing.com blog for this roundup of today’s news about SCOTUS and Montana:

“Two justices suggest Citizens United ruling should be reconsidered in Montana case”: Robert Barnes will have this article Saturday in The Washington Post.

In Saturday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin will have an article headlined “Supreme Court Blocks Montana From Enforcing Restrictions On Corporate Political Spending.”

The Washington Times has a news update headlined “Justice says Supreme Court should revisit campaign finance.”

The Billings Gazette has a news update headlined “U.S. Supreme Court blocks Montana ban on corporate election spending.”

Mark Sherman of The Associated Press reports that “High court blocks Mont. campaign money ruling.”

James Vicini of Reuters reports that “US justices allow Montana corporation election spending.”

Mike Sacks of The Huffington Post reports that “Supreme Court Blocks Montana Campaign Finance Ban.”

Josh Gerstein of Politico.com has a blog post titled “Supreme Court blocks Montana campaign finance ruling.”

And at “SCOTUSblog,” Lyle Denniston has a post titled “Montana campaign ruling on hold.”

You can access today’s stay order of the U.S. Supreme Court at this link.


High Court Blocks Mont. Campaign Money Ruling (Associated Press) The court’s action Friday does not mean the justices eventually will hear the case. Their most likely course might be simply reversing the state court ruling.

It probably will be several months before they decide what to do.

Court Blocks Montana Campaign-Finance Ruling (Jess Bravin, The Wall Street Journal, 2/17/12)But in December, the Montana Supreme Court rejected that argument, concluding by a 5-2 vote that the Citizens United opinion left open the possibility similar state laws could be constitutional if justified by specific facts.

Montana’s early history, the court observed, was pervaded by political corruption underwritten by out-of-state mining interests, prompting a 1912 voter initiative intended to limit “naked corporate manipulation” of state and local government, Montana Chief Justice Mike McGrath wrote. A century later, Montana remains “especially vulnerable to continued efforts of corporate control to the detriment of democracy and the republican form of government,” he wrote.

Supreme Court Blocks Montana Campaign Finance Ban (Mike Sacks, Huffington Post, 2/17/12) The ruling Friday evening sets up a possible full-blown U.S. Supreme Court rematch over the 2010 Citizens United decision that allowed unlimited corporate campaign spending.

 

Context

Montana’s challenge to ‘super PACs’ (The Christian Science Monitor, 2/14/12) Montana’s high court challenges the moral basis for the US Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling that spawned super PACs. The high court needs to rebalance free speech vs. democracy.

Meanwhile, in Montana, Citizens United Need Not Apply (Charles P. Pierce, Esquire, 1/3/12)”The question then, is when in the last 99 years did Montana lose the power or interest sufficient to support the statute, if it ever did,” the majority said. “We think not.”

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Twitter Digg Delicious Stumbleupon Technorati Facebook Email

9 Responses to “SCOTUS vs. Montana: News and Links”

  1. We will not give up until Citizens United is overturned!

  2. We will not give up until Citizens United is overturned!

  3. We will not give up until Citizens United is overturned!

  4. Nikki Willoughby February 18, 2012 at 6:54 am

    Supreme Court Puts Montana Ban on Corporate Campaigning On Hold (Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet.com, 2/17/12) http://bit.ly/wAvHWs

    Notably, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in the stay order that should the full Court take the case that it “will give the Court an opportunity to consider whether, in light of the huge sums currently deployed to buy candidates’ allegiance, Citizens United should continue to hold sway.”

  5. Nikki Willoughby February 18, 2012 at 6:54 am

    Supreme Court Puts Montana Ban on Corporate Campaigning On Hold (Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet.com, 2/17/12) http://bit.ly/wAvHWs

    Notably, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in the stay order that should the full Court take the case that it “will give the Court an opportunity to consider whether, in light of the huge sums currently deployed to buy candidates’ allegiance, Citizens United should continue to hold sway.”

  6. Nikki Willoughby February 18, 2012 at 6:54 am

    Supreme Court Puts Montana Ban on Corporate Campaigning On Hold (Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet.com, 2/17/12) http://bit.ly/wAvHWs

    Notably, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in the stay order that should the full Court take the case that it “will give the Court an opportunity to consider whether, in light of the huge sums currently deployed to buy candidates’ allegiance, Citizens United should continue to hold sway.”

  7. I’m not that much of a online reader to be honest but your blogs really nice, keep it up! I’ll go ahead and bookmark your website to come back in the future. All the best

  8. As a Newbie, I am always exploring online for articles that can benefit me. Thank you

  9. Good day! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this site? I’m getting fed up of WordPress because I’ve had issues with hackers and I’m looking at options for another platform. I would be great if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.