really?

Your comment implies that you think what I'm saying is partisan (which I disagree with), and that means that I must be a partisan.

Rather than making it personal, why don't you explain why--I assume--you think it's okay for phone companies to receive retroactive immunity when they may have violated their customers' privacy rights and when their knowledge as party to the warrantless wiretapping program appears crucial to any investigation into the executive branch's conduct?

I'm terribly concerned that the next president will see this kind of lawbreaking activity as precedent for his/her own ability to thwart the Constitution and the Congress.  You're not?