Should Californians Convene a Constitutional Convention?
By Derek Cressman Posted on Tue Feb 24, 2009 at 11:48:34 PM EST
I attended a gathering in Sacramento today of several hundred civic leaders who think that California's government has become so dysfunctional that we should call a citizens convention that would propose major changes to how our state government works. Some states do this routinely, but California has not had one since 1879.
The summit, convened by the Bay Area Council and co-sponsored by Common Cause, the League of Women Voters, The William C Velasquez Institute, Courage Campaigns, the Center for Governmental Studies, and the New America Foundation, saw a standing room only crowd that seemed ready to tackle some serious issues.
Ideas for what topics a convention could consider included reforming the budget process, term limits, the number of constituents each legislator represents, and ways to improve the citizen initiative process. Lt Governor Garamendi, for example, suggested that California move to a unicameral legislature like Nebraska has, which would mean that 120 legislators could represent fewer people and stay in office for up to 14 years (as they do now in two different chambers.)
Lining their own nests....
By Kathay Feng Posted on Mon Dec 08, 2008 at 07:27:05 PM EST
Lately, those of you who have had the misfortune of getting caught in one of my rants have heard how angry I am about the pay raises that that the Legislature gave to itself and staff this year. In case you are tempted to feel sorry for them, Ca. Assembly members earn $116,208 / year. Don't even get me going on the recent full-time six-figure commission appointments, aka golden parachutes for ex-legislators. SF Chronicle just reported that they have put in their orders for new cars to lease for 2009. This might just be a drop in the bucket of a projected $28 billion budget shortfall, but it is offensive in the threatened face of cuts to essential services.
Well, the Sac Bee came out with this cartoon. I thought it said it all.
Election day in California
By Joann Fuller Posted on Wed Nov 05, 2008 at 02:24:12 PM EST
Wanted to report on the election protection efforts of Common Cause on Election Day 2008. I was on calls reporting on efforts in CA and the nation. As of 4pm, election protection efforts have fielded more than 72,000 calls nationwide and 5,096 calls in CA.
We heard on the 10am call that there were long lines in Los Angeles and that many polling places didn't have the supplemental registration lists for those registering late. So those folks had to vote by provisional ballot. In addition, many polling places in LA didn't have enough ballots. In some cases they didn't have any.
Taking voter calls in California
By Josh Zaharoff Posted on Tue Nov 04, 2008 at 07:30:48 PM EST
Election Protection command center in Los Angeles
It may not be glamorous, but there's something exciting about pictures like this -- what just one of the many Election Protection command centers look like around the country, with trained volunteers and legal professionals taking calls and logging it into our database for any follow up.
This is from LA, where polls remain open and calls continue to pour in. You can view the breakdown of calls we've been getting all day at the OurVoteLive site.
National Popular Vote in CA
By Josh Zaharoff Posted on Mon Aug 18, 2008 at 04:22:53 PM EST
The LA Times enthusiastically supports the National Popular Vote plan for California, which Common Cause and a coalition of groups have been pushing in CA and around the country. Thanks to the electoral college, the United States holds elections in which the candidate who wins the most votes doesn't always win the presidency. Voters in some states matter much more than others, so candidates are encouraged to ignore the concerns of the less important ones and focus on those who really make a difference. That, in turn, tends to lower turnout because many voters believe their input doesn't matter. Is this any way to run a democracy? Sidestepping the electoral college simply assures that the majority would rule in the presidential race, just as it does in every other election in this country except the one for its highest office. The National Popular Vote bill in California is likely to get a vote in the Senate soon, and then it goes to the Governor's desk; unfortunately, Schwarzenegger vetoed it two years ago, but the Times argues for him to reconsider. Schwarzenegger's rationale for vetoing the popular-vote bill two years ago was that it disregarded "the will of a majority of Californians" because it could award the state's electoral votes to a candidate the state's voters didn't approve. That's a very odd argument. The state's choice of a candidate is irrelevant if its pick doesn't win elsewhere.
California Common Cause Launches Redistricting Initiative to Put Voters First
By Derek Cressman Posted on Tue Dec 04, 2007 at 09:26:44 AM EST
Common Cause's Kathay Feng Announces the Voters FIRST Redistricting Reform Ballot Initiative
California Common Cause has worked for years to change the process by which politicians currently draw their own political districts -- a process that in effect allows politicians to choose their voters before voters can choose among politicians.
These efforts took a big step forward today with the official launch of the Voters FIRST initiative. This ballot question, filed by Common Cause, AARP, and the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce, will appear on the November 2008 ballot if enough Californians sign petitions to support it by next April.
Read the full text of the initiative here.
Today, the campaign received a big boost in receiving endorsements from the California League of Women Voters and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Wanted: Finance Reform for Local Elections
The North County Times, a California newspaper serving San Diego and Riverside Counties, reported that money can talk, especially in San Bernardino County, at all levels of government. San Bernardino's Bill Postmus spent an outrageous $2.4 million dollars on his campaign to win the seat of county assessor in his local 2006 election.
In California, where the majority of its 58 counties and 478 cities do not cap individual contributions to candidates running for local offices, special interests such as developers and casino-operators are spending thousands to buy political influence at the expense of the community.
Oh please, just make it stop!
By Dave Algoso Posted on Thu Oct 19, 2006 at 04:00:29 PM EST
The latest ad from California's Yes on 89 campaign is available on YouTube.
Click here to watch it now.
For anyone not familiar with election season in California, this is a pretty accurate portrayal of what it feels like to be a voter, especially when it comes to ballot measures.
|