Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government
Government Accountability
Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

The Day After ...

There is much to think about today. Before we go any further our deepest gratitude goes out to the thousands of our own volunteers and election monitors, as well as to thousands and thousands of poll watchers, volunteers,and poll workers from all over the country who put in some much passion and energy to avert a recount scenario of 2000 national elections.

Thankfully we will not have to go through the agony and uncertainty of the 2000 election aftermath. However, if we are to hold ourselves up as the standard bearer of democracy we must hold ourselves to a higher standard of breathing a sigh of relieve for not having to go through another nightmarish scenario of Florida 2000. The fact remains that just by doing a quick review of news reports from all across the country, it seems that little has been done to improve our election system since 2000. In close elections around the country, media scrutiny once again reveals that the problems of 2002 remain unfixed.

For example, in Florida, it was reported that 6,020 touch screens were removed, with votes already cast to be believed to be retrievable. In Volusia County, a memory card failed and 13,000 votes had not been counted. Insufficient training of poll workers resulted in long lines and confusion about provisional ballots. Precincts, such as Hialeah, opened thirty minutes late.

In New Orleans six voting machines had mechanical problems after a polling commissioner had accidentally turned them off and they could not be restarted. There were also reports that poll workers were sufficiently trained on the use of provisional ballots, and some individuals were not allowed to vote until 9 a.m.

In Mauldin, South Carolina one polling location was forced to switch to paper ballots as a result of equipment failures. In Essex, Maryland, on election judge left the polling place because he "forgot something" and voters were left to vote by provisional ballot.

Ohio Voter, Sarah White was among the many that wished to vote in her county and had not received absentee ballots. White was told that ruling against granting provisional ballots to those that requested absentee ballots was required to prevent double voting. White filed suit in Toledo hoping to have a provisional ballot as an option to voters. Federal District Judge David A. Katz rule in favor of White's appeal and ordered that election official to issues provisional ballots to those who requested it and claimed to be eligible to vote.

And, we are sure we can find many more similar reports from all across the country. As we move on, we along with our friends in many other like-minded organizations representing all political spectrums are going to continue to work diligently to seek improvements in our flawed election system.  We are now focusing on our first task in this project to improve our voting process, which is to use all the information we have collected and produce a detailed analysis of what took place and what we need to do improve it, so that all parties can be satisfied with the final outcome and be confident in the integrity of our democratic process.


Tags: Action for Elections (all tags)


Display:

changing the voting process in america

to save the integrity of our democracy, a grass root movement state by state needs to be formed to change the voting system in this country. it is obvious to me from all the gliches and voting problems from the nov 2 elections that i have come to the conclusion that the 3.5 million votes were spoiled and the elections were stolen again. of course there will be no proof of this but it stands to reason that if the voting system is not changed then this country can expect this type of "democracy"  for future generations, the bottom line our votes don't count as long as the playing field is not fair. i am asking all americans on how we can get the election system changed.

by mohawkthunder on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 05:20:36 PM EST


Re: changing the voting process in america

i agree with you completely-- this was not in any way shape or form a fair election. i feel so angry right now-- as much about the silence of the democrats and the mainstream media as about the apparent fraudulency of the elections themselves.  unfortunately i have no answers about what we can do to get the election system changed.  i am looking for the same answers but i feel so helpless right now and so fearful for the next four years. does anyone have any answers?  

by mirbrod on Wed Nov 03, 2004 at 10:44:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Re: changing the voting process in America

Mirbrod-

You are the among the many that feel this way.  I do not believe that this was in any form a fair election.  There are so many provisional ballots still unaccounted for, so many absentee ballots that didn't get to their destination and I don't even want to get start on Ohio.  I too am fearful of the next four years; I believe things are only going to get worse. At Kerry's concession speech Kerry said "...is now clear that even when all the provisional ballots are counted, which they will be, there won't be enough outstanding votes for us to be able to win Ohio. And therefore we cannot win this election." While I was not happy that Kerry conceded I am so pleased that Kerry said "the outcome should be decided by voters, not a protracted legal process" because it proved Kerry's commitment to the American people regardless of the fact that he was not elected to office.  
I called Common Cause on November 3rd to find out what was being done about situations at the polls and I was told that research was already underway, so that's a piece of good news.  Nice to know that someone's doing something.  With any luck we will have some reform to the election system because change needs to happen.  

by sonicspeed on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 11:48:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Re: changing the voting process in america

Here are some changes I think should be made to ensure our election process is fair and accessible.
  1. a universal registration roll that is accurate and does not leave registrants off the rolls. For better accuracy, this database should be cross-referenced with DMV lists, and other government lists to ensure that voters are not purged from this list others are not registered twice.
  2. more voting machines at each polling place to remedy the problem of long lines. It is unfair to expect people to wait in lines for up to three hours.
  3. paper trail for DRE machines to ensure that each vote is counted and in the event these machines fail there will be hard "evidence" of each voters intentions
  4. better poll training and incentives for volunteering. In many polling places, poll workers were insufficiently trained and as a result, they were not able to answer questions voters had and did not truly understand the purpose of the provisional ballot.  We should offer stipends or course credit to increase the number of poll workers we have in each precinct to monitor elections.  The more unbiased eyes on elections, the less discrimination that can occur.
  5. same day registration in many states.  Many states have already begun to implement this, and as a result these states have higher voter turnout rates.
  6. Eliminate partisan registration challenges. These are clear attempts to intimidate voters and suppress the voices of particular voting groups.  We must allow every voice to be heard without undue burden.
  7. Registration and absentee guidelines should be made known throughout each precinct, either through mailings, tv announcements, or announcement in newspapers.
  8. We must better staff our board of elections. It should be more efficient for people to get their registration cards and absentee ballots.
  9. We need more voting machines that are accessible in other languages such as spanish, chinese, french, etc.
  10. We need people to protect their rights, this may mean calling the board of elections a month before the election to confirm their registration and polling place, this way problems can be remedied before the day of the election.

These are just a few steps, but I believe their are progressive steps that will make our electoral system a truer and fair democracy.

by jsmit09 on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 03:48:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Stolen Election

Please help! There is too much evidence and there are too many good reasons to suspect fraud with regard to the election "results" generated by the electronic voting machines in place around the country. Please look at articles like http://www.bluelemur.com/index.php?p=388 and important blogs like http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=129 0765&mesg_id=1290765 and tell us how we can fight this. I worked Election Protection in Hillsborough County in Florida (the now famous "I-4 corridor" in mid-Florida) and I know that what I saw happening there (minority vote and youth vote and elderly turnout) isn't consistent with what is now being reported. I know in my heart that between 3pm and 8pm eastern time on Tuesday, Nov. 2nd, at the behest of Karl Rove and other powerful Republicans, approximately 5% of all Kerry votes in swing states that didn't legally require a papaer trail for their electronic voting machines were "purged" from the system. Please, please, please tell us how to uncover this. Regardless of the outcome with regard to the results of this election, the legitimacy of our entire democratic process is at stake in light of these indicators. I just want to remind everyone of a quote from late summer of last year, made by the CEO of Diebold: "[I am] committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year." HELP, PLEASE!!!

by lilarogers on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 04:51:02 PM EST


Re: Stolen Election

I think that in regards to purging, if this did happen, which I dont suspect DID NOT happen, it is only stronger evidence that these systems are not fail safe. At a NPA conference, computer programmer Yogi Benjamin, and Common Cause's Ed Davis highlighted the problems with these DRE's. It is obvious that in order for us to have clean, safe elections, we must have paper trails on these DRE's to ensure that every vote is counted. It was definately a knee jerk reaction by many of these states and counties to run out and purchase the DRE's to show that they were doing something to combate voter fraud but this does not mean that we need to sacrifice our election integrity. If we want to ensure that these votes are not purged we must start pressuring people in power, though it will be now be more difficult, and demand paper trails. This is the only way on these computers to ensure that every vote is counted.

by jsmit09 on Thu Nov 04, 2004 at 08:03:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Alternatives

Has anyone on this blog ever addressed the Oregon voting method?  ALL of our ballots are mail-in.  We receive our ballots in the mail several weeks before Election Day, plenty of time to find out you're not registered or didn't receive a ballot.

We have no polling places, no lines (except for those of us who drive by and drop our ballots off at the county office at the last minute - guilty as charged), NO COMPUTERS.  Our ballots are the classic Scantron-type, fill-in-the-oval forms, like you've all used for tests.  Ink or pencil can be used, and thus the mark can be indelible.

No system is failsafe; I'm sure you can spot many opportunities for fraud to be perpetrated in this system, too.  And several people received more than one ballot this year.  But it does seem to eliminate several of the more egregious possibilities.  Not to mention that it's a helluva lot cheaper than computerized systems.

However, it has made voting a more leisurely and thoughtful process instead of a one-day-only event.  There are several drop-off points, including local libraries as well as the county elections office, if you don't want to mail the ballot in.

Did I mention that Kerry won in Oregon by 9%?

Babs

by badgerbabs on Fri Nov 05, 2004 at 12:54:54 AM EST


Re: Alternatives

I am not so sure this method would be less troubled then the other systems.  Like you note, in some instances more than one ballot has been sent and on a grand scale this could result in the same vote dilution as when too many ballots are counted on DRE voting machines. As for the comment, "it has made voting a more leisurely and thoughtful process instead of a one-day-only event", I have a few problems with this statement and I encourage you to openly object. I do not have a problem with voting being more accessible, and less strenuous, and I most definitely believe that having voters wait for hours in line is wrong, but I do not thing voting should be laid back. Time and energy should go into the process and people must put due diligence into their choices. Secondly, I do not wish to believe that voting is only a one day only event. I don't believe a majority of these voters make up their minds on the day of election, but rather, I have confidence that they think about the issues for a great while. Finally, I believe initiatives this year for early voting, though unsuccessful in many districts because of a lack of polling locations and machines, prove that this is not a one day event. I don't know that DRE's are the answer, though I think at this time the best voting measure is DRE's with a paper trail, but I believe even the absentee ballot measures in Oregon are open to fraud. This is why we must continue to study this current election, and come up with a strategy to curb and remove the fraud that tainted our democracy.

by jsmit09 on Sun Nov 07, 2004 at 07:48:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]


election fraud


While i am fully convinced this election was not fair, i am also somewhat suspicious of some of the fraud "evidence" i have seen posted on blogs.  where is this information coming from? how can i get my hands on the raw data?

by mirbrod on Tue Nov 09, 2004 at 05:11:18 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account just by filling out the form below. It's quick and free.


contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy