Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government
Government Accountability
Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

Help Us Update the Common Cause 2005 Agenda

Common Cause is honored to have hundreds of thousands of members all across the United States. With your help during the last thirty five years, we have led successful efforts for campaign finance reform, ethics and accountability in government, and open government at the national, state, and local levels. We joined with coalitions fighting for civil rights legislation, ending wasteful weapons programs, and working for reforms to our nation's system of voting.

We are in the process of planning/updating the issue campaigns that we want to wage in 2005. These plans will involve a considerable investment of Common Cause resources: time, energy, and money.

Here are the main program goals we will make a committment to in 2005:

  • MEDIA REFORM Increase the diversity of voices and ownership in media, make media more responsive to the needs of citizens in a democracy, and protect the editorial independence of public broadcasting.

  • MONEY IN POLITICS Advance campaign reforms at the state and federal level that make people and ideas more important than money.

  • ELECTION REFORM Remove barriers to voting and ensure that our voting systems are accurate, accessible, and fair.

  • REDISTRICTING REFORM Provide voters with the opportunity to cast votes in competitive elections by replacing partisan redistricting committees with nonpartisan redistricting commissions and well defined goals for drawing district boundaries.

  • GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY Make certain that government is open, ethical and accountable.

  • EYE ON IRAQ Hold our government accountable for the costs -- in lives, money, and international credibility -- for the invasion of Iraq.

As we are preparing to lay out specific target goals and benchmarks for 2005 in all of the campaigns referenced above, we want your input:

As you know we rely on our members to work with us on issues within their own state and on the federal level. It is the power of all of you that gives weight to our voice.  This is why it is critical you participate in our poll and share with us your thoughts, feedback, and suggestions in the comment section in this post and help us set priorities. Thanks again.


Tags: (all tags)


Display:

Year Ahead

Ensuring that our government is accountable has always been the overarching aim of Common Cause.  This effort explains CC's interest in all the other issues listed.

The Bush administration's previous term has dramatically illustrated that despite the many reforms made since the 70s, our executive branch still operates without meaningful accountability in many critical areas.

The most disturbing examples perhaps are:

1)the continuing failure of Congress or the Judiciary to assert accountability for the treatment of persons detained by our military and intelligence agencies.

2)The ability of legislative conference committees to operate in complete secrecy

3)The ability of the President or even the Sec. of Defense alone to send troops into combat and spend funds for combat without complete oversight from Congress as "suggested" (or some might still be bold enough to say "mandated") by the Constitution

4)The ability of government agencies to remove more information than ever from public review under the label of "secret" or "sensitive" information

5)The complete failure of the congressional ethics enforcement regime to punish such behavior as a)misusing the FAA to track a plane for political purposes b) receiving contributions illegal under state law or c) systematically undermining the purpose of rules against soliciting campaign funds in connection with a charitable organization or d)someone making an offer to contribute $100,000 to a campaign in return for a vote in favor of the prescription drug benefit.

All of these stand in stark contrast to CC's vision of an "open, honest and accountable government."

Congress should be prodded to enforce the commitment of the United States to the Geneva Conventions.  The entire debate over what is and what is not a violation of the convention can be shut down simply by Congress saying what it thinks.  The executive will then be bound by that interpretation.  Lets see Bush send people to testify in favor of waterboarding and hooding and enforced sex acts and extended restraint etc.  Its an uphill battle considering Congress'quiet approval of these methods but a battle that the public seems overwhelmingly to support.  Thats a perfect issue for CC to promote.  

It may seem a bit lofty from a domestic perspective, however America's international image is likely to be identical with that of the hooded Iraqi for the next decade or so unless the government is held accountable.

The use of secret conference committees to skirt the democratic process was put to heavy use by the White House and Congressional Republicans in the last term.  This tactic will no doubt increase with their stronger hold on both majorities.  The practice is fundamentally undemocratic and devoid of any accountability.  CC should move to take conference committees out of the shadows.

I put these at the top of my list.  They are a little beyond what CC normally pursues, however both are hugely important.

I support many other initiatives already underway as well but feel these two have gone unadressed despite a wealth of commentary and polling showing that both are hugely unpopular.  When no politicians are bringing up such issues, it is the role of groups like CC to do so instead.

by Blagfly on Mon Jan 24, 2005 at 07:32:51 PM EST


More Reasons and a Suggested Solution

Today's lead editorial from the Washingtonpost pretty much says it all.  Mr. Gonzales is unacceptable as a nominee for Atty. General.  The United States is currently sanctioning torture.  Congress has the legal authority to solve the problem.  Who will hold them accountable?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A36718-2005Jan25.html

"This is not a theoretical matter. The CIA today is holding an undetermined number of prisoners, believed to be in the dozens, in secret facilities in foreign countries. It has provided no account of them or their treatment to any outside body, and it has allowed no visits by the Red Cross. According to numerous media reports, it has subjected the prisoners to many of the abuses Mr. Gonzales said "might be permissible." It has practiced such mistreatment in Iraq, even though detainees there are covered by the Geneva Conventions; according to official investigations by the Pentagon, CIA treatment of prisoners there and in Afghanistan contributed to the adoption of illegal methods by military interrogators.

In an attempt to close the loophole, Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.), Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (D-Conn.) sought to attach an amendment to the intelligence reform legislation last fall specifying that "no prisoner shall be subject to torture or cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment that is prohibited by the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States." The Senate adopted the provision unanimously. Later, however, it was stripped from the bill at the request of the White House. In his written testimony, Mr. Gonzales affirmed that the provision would have "provided legal protections to foreign prisoners to which they are not now entitled." Senators who supported the amendment consequently face a critical question: If they vote to confirm Mr. Gonzales as the government's chief legal authority, will they not be endorsing the systematic use of "cruel, inhumane and degrading" practices by the United States?"

by Blagfly on Wed Jan 26, 2005 at 06:32:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Oppose Gonzales' Confirmation

Follow this link for a video explaining why Alberto Gonzales is the last person the United States should be nominating as Attorney General and to write to your Senators to oppose his confirmation.

http://action.humanrightsfirst.org/campaign/etn_gonzales_oppose?source=ga_adv

by Blagfly on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 04:28:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Money and politics

Most citizens, even informed citizens, do not realize how deep the money problem has become.  Someone wrote here that there has always been money in politics--perhaps, but not to the extent that we see it today.

In the past, it has been more or less accepted that members of the executive and legislative branches of government were corrupt and would sell out to the highest bidder.  The judiciary were supposed to be higher-minded than that.  For a long time, the fact that judges were not paid a lot of money ensured that only dedicated men and women who had already made a half-decent living would accept a judicial appointment, since there was no fortune to be made as a judge.

Then judges' salaries were raised, and the pigs flocked to the trough.  Instead of upholding the U.S. and State Constitutions and the laws of the United States and the several States, as they swear to do, judges began looking out for each other and for their political friends, while trying to rake in as much money as possible--whether legal or no.

It used to be that the courts were the last refuge of dissidents.  Now, because the politicians control the judges, only the most courageous and independent judges are likely to go against the politicians--and their numbers are rapidly dwindling.  The average citizen does not stand a chance.  Whistleblowers are punished rather than rewarded--if you don't believe me, go to www.surrickbook.com and read the sample chapters that are available there for free.  Yes, the book concerns corruption in Pennsylvania's judiciary, but I cannot believe that such corruption is limited to a single State.

When I was a law student some 10 years ago, if you had told me that judges would behave in this fashion, I would not have believed you.  Unfortunately, I have since seen it myself.  I have seen judges decide a case fairly when no political implications arise--but as soon as a decision that actually follows the law will be politically dangerous, the case is decided the other way.  I have seen this for myself far too many times.

Unfortunately, the electorate is largely complacent, and tends to believe what their so-called "leaders" tell them to believe, whether those "leaders" are political, religious, or family members.  Too few people take the time and expend the effort to read and think for themselves, and to evaluate the statements of politicians.  The media has been largely cowed by the threat of libel lawsuits brought by politicians--and with the politicians' pet judges deciding the cases in their favor, to the tune of million-dollar payments from the media, who can blame the media for being afraid to report on government corruption?  

What makes all of this possible?  Money.  Pure and simple.  Follow the money, and you'll find the corruptors.  I fear that our system is doomed to rot from within.

Most citizens would rather watch whatever sporting event is on TV, or some "reality" show--all the while avoiding the very unpleasant "reality" that is really happening in this country.  It is the modern-day version of the "bread and circuses" given by ancient Rome.  As in, "give the people bread and circuses, and they won't pay attention to what their leaders are doing."  We have come to that.  It may be too late to do anything about it.

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 02:48:02 PM EST


Accountability

True accountability would mean that the Congress and Senate would recognize the crimes of war, and crimes of greed and hold the administration accountable by  holding Impeachment proceedings.
With a tiny handful of exceptions, all Senators and Congresspersons are bought and paid for by the same folks who own the Administration so this is not going to happen.
The Democrats are the enablers here for the Republicans agenda.  
The truth can be shouted from the rooftops but the great American public can't hear it because they are watching TV.  If they could hear it they wouldn't believe it ... they believe the TV.
Preaching to the choir ain't working.
What we gonna do?

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 02:59:11 PM EST


Presidential helicopters

    While it would seem that two million dollars (for the purchase of a presidential yacht) is a lot of money for the comfort and pleasure of our Imperial President, that's really chump change compared to the impending procurement of a fleet of 28 "presidential helicopters", scheduled for delivery in 2007, at a cost of from 1.6 to two billion dollars. You can bet your last dollar that it will be at least the latter figure, especially when cost over-runs are totaled up. By my calculation, the cost of those helicopters will range from $57 million to $71 million per copy.
    By the way, if President Clinton had to be satisfied with a fleet of a mere 19 helicopters, why does Bush need 29? For that matter, why did Clinton need 19?

--Paul G. Jaehnert
808 Bur Oak Ct.
Vadnais Hts, MN  55127

phone: (651) 407-0754

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 03:06:34 PM EST


Government reform

In my work as an instructor at a community college in the midwest, I spend a lot of time around people who, without even realizing their situation, have been marginalized by the dysfunction of our current system of government.  Yes, the way in which we vote and encourage voting needs reform - it has definitely been corrupted (which ties directly into the need for media reform and ending the  pandering between big money and big government - and suggests that we all need a good lesson in morality).  But it seems that the cavalier attitude of many would-be voters is tied more directly to their feelings of helplessness.  Government as an all or nothing proposition no longer accurately represents the people of this nation.  It is fine to elect a figurehead who appeals to the lowest common denominator - esssentially what we do when we elect a president. But the house and senate are no longer working in the grey area to balance what could easily become an authoritarian regime.  Instead of maintaining, under the guise of efficiency and strength, an outdated system of governance, why not change the house and senate to percentage based representation and open the door to the innovative thinking found in many marginalized parties.  I would sure feel better about my vote.

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 03:17:22 PM EST


Democracy,election reform and general ...

We live in a plutocratic republic,
Unfortunatly democracy is a dream that the electorate must fight for.Not very many citizens are represented in the current system.It seems a little arrogant of the current administration to install a surrogate council and then ,pretend that a resistance (to occupation)movement is trying to sabotage a popular move to democracy in Iraq.The very word insurgent is a lie.We as American citizens are denied a true democracy here,and have had two questionable elections in the last 8 years.Most Iraqis don't know the names of half of the political parties on the ballot ,never mind the candidates!How can they make an informed decision?In the U.S.we desparately need the following reforms;
Uniform ballot access laws.
Free air time for candidates .
Public financing for Local ,State,And Federal campaigns.
Verifiable paper trails on electronic voting machines ,with a reciept for the voter.
Delay of exit poll info for twelve hours after the vote.
1-2-3- run off voting in the absence of an alternative the the electoral college system we have now(winner take all)delegates would be free to vote for thier candidate.
Abolishion of the electoral college.
One person one vote.
Now I hope that the neo-cons can pull a rabbit out of their hats! And that a democratic fervor spreads throughout the middle east.All the Jihadists embrace Christians as thier brothers and denounce terrorism.And the OPEC nations pledge to build solar cells and Hydrogen fuel cells to slow global warming,and give them all away to developing nations for free!Then the world bank can cancel all of the worlds dept and we can all sing Cum By Ya and hold hands.
 

Johnny Hempseed

by kurt gubrud on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 03:35:59 PM EST


civil liberties

A high priority should be civil liberties and the repeal of the so-called Patriot Act.

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 03:51:25 PM EST


Common Cause Poll

Tough to make just one choice - every one of those listed to vote on are critical

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 03:56:42 PM EST


Energy Independence

Our most fundamental need is to begin a "Manhattan Project" equivalent to achieve energy independence (without ANWAR drilling) within 15 years.  This problem underlies many of our other isues.

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 04:00:14 PM EST


Dividing issue

Abortion is an extremely divisive issue in this country.  I and many, many others are for choice with limits and strongly oppose "abortion on demand", which is uncommon in developed countries.  I believe that librals would do themselves a huge favor by getting on board a policy that would make "the morning after pill" available but confine abortion to the first trimester unless the life of the mother is in serious danger. Along with this we need to ensure that contraception is encouraged and provided at low or no cost to women.  

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 05:38:42 PM EST


religion and state

It is wise that people not be swayed by what a leader says - even if what he says seems to match one's religious beliefs.  It is wiser to evaluate instead what a leader actually does and its benefits or peril to all.  Consider the following quotes and the sources given:

The National Government will regard it as its first and foremost duty to revive in the nation the spirit of unity and cooperation. It will preserve and defend those basic principles on which our nation has been built. It regards Christianity as the foundation of our national morality, and the family as the basis of national life.

    - Adolf Hitler,
    My New World Order
    Proclamation to the German Nation at Berlin
    February 1, 1933

I saw a elderly German lady interviewed recently.

They asked her how the German people could have gone fascist so quickly. Her answer haunts me still:

"We didn't realize it was happening until it was too late."

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 06:04:18 PM EST


Insurance Reform Web Site

I would like to see Common Cause take a stand against the Insuance Reform Bill. This bill, if passed, can hurt thousands of people who are on Workmans Comp. and give the Insurance Industry a tremendous advantage over and above what they have already.

by rng on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 06:05:08 PM EST


Abortion?

I don't understand this whole panic over abortion.

Mammalian pregnancy is an iffy thing at the best.  A considerable fraction of fertilized eggs simply do not take.

If all foeti are of human worth, how are we to view fertilized eggs which do not attach to the uterine wall?

Is the foetus that attaches to the uterine wall of more human worth than the one which is shunted out of the body and simply flushed away down the toilet?

If, on average, every third mammalian pregnancy does not take, does that mean that anybody who has a certain number of living children has also, by the rules of chance, flushed a portion of children down the toilet?

Arguing for the sacred nature of every single foetus seems like arguing for the sacred nature of Easter eggs.

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 07:03:05 PM EST


thank you

Your blog is realy very interesting.

by Anonymous Citizen on Sat Sep 17, 2005 at 12:58:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Easter Eggs

The Easter Eggs comment was me.  I just hadn't gotten this posting thing down yet...

www.stinz.com

by dbarr on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 07:06:55 PM EST


Democracy in The U.S.A., What a radical idea?

Dear Chellie Pingree,

I have contributed to Common Cause when I was on my last 50 Dollars, so please listen to what this member has to say.
I (as well as so many Democrats and some rank and file Republicans) am tired of this corrupt electoral system.
We as a Country are so far behind the rest of the free world when it comes to Democracy, I think the United States needs to be the arsenal of democracy, as it once was in World War 2.
More voices preserve Democracy.
Democrats need to introduce Fairness Doctrine and Equal Time Bill to prevent the Mainstream Media from undermining Democracy.
The Democratic Party Chair needs to support Serious Media Reform, We will never regain the U.S. House and Senate unless this is accomplished.

The Democratic Party Chair needs to work for serious media reform, including substantial free air time for candidates and parties. Given the high cost of campaigns, the power of corporate special interests, and the fact that the networks are given free use of the public's airwaves, I believe that the networks should be required to give something back other than "reality" shows.

Media conglomerates are currently among the most powerful lobbyists against media reform, but I believe that were the media to provide substantive coverage of politics it would actually boost both media ratings and voter turnout.

In addition to requiring free air time for political campaigns, we need a House and a Senate who will create a greater diversity of viewpoints in the media by breaking up the major media conglomerates, encouraging competition and quality as well as diversity. We need new caps on media ownership and would ban the granting of exceptions to those caps. Limit the number of media outlets one corporation can own in a given medium, such as radio, print, or television. Work to strictly prohibit cross-ownership and vertical integration.

The people should be involved in the maintenance of their airwaves, creating public media outlets controlled by community boards similar to the model of Pacifica Radio. Funding for public broadcasting channels on television and radio should be greatly expanded, assuring the existence of media outlets free of the influence of advertisers.

Please promote knowledge of the public process through which citizens can challenge the licenses of local broadcast outlets failing to provide local coverage and coverage directed at the whole community, or outlets airing excessive violence.

Allow not-for-profit groups to obtain high-power FM radio-station licenses, while encouraging the development of new, community-based, noncommercial broadcasting outlets.

Please work to withdraw the United States from the World Trade Organization, which media companies are currently lobbying for the creation of trade sanctions against countries that fund public broadcasting, limit foreign ownership of media, or establish standards for local content. For similar reasons, Please block U.S. participation in the proposed Free Trade Area of the Americas.

The next Democratic Party Chair must push for
Serious Electoral Reform.
The Electoral College has to be abolished, We need (Full)Proportional Representation, Instant Run-off Voting, Cross-Party Endorsement or "Fusion" and Public Financing For Elections.

Common Cause needs to work with www.fairvote.org rr@fairvote.org

We need to build a working relationship with the Greens to accomplish these reforms as well as develop a United Front, (Full) Proportional Representation Cross-Party Endorsement and Instant Run-off Voting would create unity because there would be a place for all of us on the Center-Left and Left, which historically speaking has always been fractured and divided in The United States.

Please contact Fair Vote

F a i r V o t e
The Center for Voting and Democracy
6930 Carroll Avenue, Suite 610
Takoma Park, MD 20912
www.fairvote.org
rr@fairvote.org
Phone(301) 270-4616
Fax  (301) 270-4133

by TrueDemocracy on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 07:19:02 PM EST


Re: Democracy in The U.S.A., What a radical idea?

Hey, TrueDemocracy,

First, thanks for donating to Common Cause when you didn't have cash to spare. Wow, that is humbling.

Second, I wanted to let you know that we are working with FairVote and have for a long time. They do great work.

Barbara Burt, Common Cause Election Reform Team Leader

by Barb Burt on Fri Jan 28, 2005 at 12:22:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Government Accountability

While all of these issues are crucially important, government accountability is clearly the most essential.  Indeed, none of the other issues can be satisfactorily addressed unless government accountability is esstablished at the outset.  This feature is profoundly lacking in the current administration.

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 07:33:42 PM EST


Government Accountability

While all of these issues are crucially important, government accountability is clearly the most essential.  Indeed, none of the other issues can be satisfactorily addressed unless government accountability is esstablished at the outset.  This feature is profoundly lacking in the current administration.

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 07:39:03 PM EST


9/11 & NO CHOICE

THIS ADMINISTRATION DID 9/11! GO SEE WWW.FROMTHE WILDERNESS.COM, WWW.DAVIDICKE.COM, OR WWW.LETSROLL911.ORG. LETS HAVE, NOT ANOTHER WARREN COMMISSION, BUT A TRULY INDEPENDANT INVESTIGATION.

WE ARE PRESENTED WITH A SUPPOSSED CHOICE OF  ONLY 2 PARTIES (WHILE THERE ARE AT LEAST 6-4 OF WHOM WE NEVER HEAR  ABOUT AND WHO ACTUALLY DISCUSS ISSUES IMPORTANT TO THE PEOPLE.) NO MATTER HOW WE CAST OUR VOTES-WE END UP WITH FASCISTS. GORE ROLLED OVER JOYFULLY, KERRY ROLLED OVER TOO QUICKLY WHILE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF OHIOANS WERE PREVENTED FROM CATSING THEIR BALLOTS AND WHEN THEY DID THE "MAGIC" ELECTRONIC MACHINES GAVE THEM ALL TO BUSH. KIDNAPP A FEW AND HAVE THEM CHECKED OUT!

 

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 07:46:17 PM EST


Election reform

This is job #1, folks.  We can't accomplish anything progressive in this country unless we can be assured that our votes count.
The system needs to be changed from the bottom up.  There should be paper ballots (no more computers) there should be nonpartisan people staffing the polls and counting the votes,
Election Day should be a holiday so people don't have to miss work to vote.  There should not be long lines!  Every district should be checked in advance to see that there are enough voting machines. People should be able to vote early.  All absentee/provisional ballots should be counted BEFORE anyone concedes the election.   And finally:  no more Electoral College!  The Founding Fathers were, alas, landed gentry and elitist and didn't trust the popular vote--hence, the Electoral College.  There is no reason why we cannot have a popular vote election.
We now have an illegitimate President who was able to steal the election twice in a row because the system is so easy to defraud!

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 08:50:20 PM EST


Politics of Polarization

The Republican Party has taken a radical, extreme turn to the right.  They have hijacked politics and government to serve the needs of the largest corporate powers without regard for the ordinary citizen.   This is class warfare, initiated by the extreme right, and they want us to be polite and not mention or wage class war.  It is they who have polarized America, and it is not our job to attempt to de-polarize it as that would play right into their hands.

In this context, if the Democratic Party persists in trying to win over Republicans by being a little right-ish, our Party will eventually vanish into the proverbial dustbin of history.  But if the Party would meet the Republicans'  polarization of society with principled polarities of our own and take its position firmly in the ranks of the working public, it could take a clear, principled stand in opposition to the interests of the right and the corporate power-elite.   Those current Republican citizens who are disgusted with the deterioration of their lives and the status of America under Republican government would then have the option of changing parties to represent their own interest as clarified by the new, principled, Democratic Party.  

The denial of the on-going polarization of American politics is to play into the hands of the right that wishes to ply its class-based trade without the inconvenience of an overt ideological class war.  They have started that war, and we cannot pretend it doesn't exist while the right deepens it and wins it.  Our confusion on this serves them.  

So I say "POLARIZE!"   The Democratic Party must take a clear, principled stand against that power that is seizing excessive control of America in the interest of its own excessive power.   But if we fail to accept the challenge and instead opt for the warm fuzzies of non-confrontive middle-of-the-road politics, we will be rendered impotent by the right and discarded by the public who looks for real leadership.

I don't think there is any alternative to the polarization of politics but to watch the Democratic Party decline into insignificance while America is destroyed by the extreme right-wing greed that has seized control.  These powerful elite aren't about to reverse their course for our benefit.  We must stand against them, -not argue with them over how best to serve their class needs.

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 10:37:18 PM EST


You Missed the Most Important Issue

The Patriot Act must be revoked before any changes can be made to government.  All the power is with our currently elected officials.  The most powerful weapon of all is the Patriot Act.  It has already been abused.  The latest abuse of this act occurred recently in Bronx, New York.  It was used to hold a man accused only of criminal charges.  He was not suspected of committing conspiracy or terrorism.  This is not the first time this act has been abused.  This is only the beginning.  If anyone is deemed too big of a threat to the current criminals in power, don't think for a minute they won't use the Patriot Act to control and intimidate.

by arenae on Fri Jan 28, 2005 at 10:55:14 AM EST


Confront the Religious Right with Truth/Inquiry

Before there can be significant headway with progressive agendas all people, all "Christians" especially, must confront the religious right with inquiry and the search for truth. Certain questions must be raised, even uneasy questions: 1.How can our government leaders, corporate leaders and right wing "Christians" consider the consequences of aiding and abetting "end time/second coming of Christ" beliefs with the actual compassionate teachings of Christ. 2. How can the murder of tens of thousand of Iraqi's and the American corporate domination of their country/Oil be reconciled with Christian (or other religious/moral teachings) 3. How can the destruction of democratic principles-( the monopolization of the media/right of truthful information; checks and balances of government through leadership without conflicts of interests etc.) be an advancement in Religious Freedom, Social Equity or Justice? 4. How can one Christian group decide that women do not have or are able to use their spiritual conscience on determining whether their impregnation shall bear life (and exactly when a "fetus" should be considered "a child") 5. Is all this confliction, confusion due to sheer ignorance, propaganda, belief without due consideration, or is it all of this with the influence and governmental collusion with intervening alien forces (as posited in the book "Allies of Humanity").

by Anonymous Citizen on Fri Jan 28, 2005 at 02:18:30 PM EST


Confront the Religious Right with Truth/Inquiry

Before there can be significant headway with progressive agendas all people, all "Christians" especially, must confront the religious right with inquiry and the search for truth. Certain questions must be raised, even uneasy questions: 1.How can our government leaders, corporate leaders and right wing "Christians" consider the consequences of aiding and abetting "end time/second coming of Christ" beliefs with the actual compassionate teachings of Christ. 2. How can the murder of tens of thousand of Iraqi's and the American corporate domination of their country/Oil be reconciled with Christian (or other religious/moral teachings) 3. How can the destruction of democratic principles-( the monopolization of the media/right of truthful information; checks and balances of government through leadership without conflicts of interests etc.) be an advancement in Religious Freedom, Social Equity or Justice? 4. How can one Christian group decide that women do not have or are able to use their spiritual conscience on determining whether their impregnation shall bear life (and exactly when a "fetus" should be considered "a child") 5. Is all this confliction, confusion due to sheer ignorance, propaganda, belief without due consideration, or is it all of this with the influence and governmental collusion with intervening alien forces (as posited in the book "Allies of Humanity").

by Anonymous Citizen on Fri Jan 28, 2005 at 02:20:21 PM EST


peace idea

A MENTAL VIRUS caused the Iraq war and the reelection of George bush.    Just as a virus can cause a PC to work against itself a mental virus can affect the human mind. The Theories of Tim LaHaye have made the Iraq war possible and reelected George Bush.  The foreign policy of the United States is based upon these religious views.  LaHay has picked up upon a story concocted in the nineteenth century from random Bible verses.  After the Jews have captured the rest of the biblical territory the anti-Christ will attack it leading to the battle of Armageddon.  LaHaye with help has written a series of novels and made a movie based pm this story and millions believe it to be true Bible prophecy. This is the cause of the Iraq war.  Brother Bush believes it.

by Anonymous Citizen on Fri Jan 28, 2005 at 04:00:14 PM EST


friendly criticism: flaws of your poll

With all due respect (and I REALLY mean that), you should allow people to prioritize the entire list and take the averages of the ratings (most important, 2nd most, etc.

by Anonymous Citizen on Sat Jan 29, 2005 at 02:55:50 PM EST


Powerful network -Coimmon Cause

As an admirer of your website, I suggest an addition to your site.
I believe you can make your views heard, and ours, and influence our lawmakers by making available website voting, with signatures. These can become petitions to inform our legislators as to how we, the people, want to be represented.

Thank you for being an important voice for democracy.

by Anonymous Citizen on Sat Jan 29, 2005 at 03:02:01 PM EST


Re: Powerful network -Coimmon Cause

That is a great idea. I believe considering the great response to the polls so far we are going to have more of this in the upcoming ideas. But I really like your idea of somehow turning these polls into live/active online petitions with comments and then presenting it to law makers. We are going to look into this.

by Murshed Zaheed on Sun Jan 30, 2005 at 02:34:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Money and Politics

Honestly, I think the issue boils down to money.  Sure, there are many different aspects and ways of looking at things, but which way is impacting and influencing a party's use of power?

Money.  It's just that clear to me.  Some will say that we were in Iraq to free the people, but honestly, wasn't that a secondary notion?  I mean, if it was a primary consideration, wouldn't we have tried to build the nation first before trying to get every contractor over there for the "rebuilding" operation.  Perhaps some things were needed, but the whole thing is just seedy and needs to be looked at carefully.

I honestly think we need to get the money out of government as much as possible.  It has led to blood being spilled, candidates changing their views, and dishonest representation of the constituents that elect these people.  And it, honestly, is a problem all across the board and party lines.

If George W. Bush and his administration are so-incredbily Christian and moral, why not have them put the whole truth out there?  Why not get the tough questions answered?  Why not find where the money is driving the politics?  And then, we need to clean our own hands from any dirt because that doesn't make us look much better if we're getting involved in the seedy activities.

The Democratic party needs not be a Republican-lite party.  It needs to be the party of truth and what's right for the people.  Sure, there are principles to be shared between parties, but where they stray, we need to focus.

Take care and God bless,

Jared

by Lloyd Dobler on Sun Jan 30, 2005 at 10:23:02 AM EST


We Should Focus on What Hit the Pentagon

The easiest way to show 911 was a hoax is to focus on the Pentagon attack.  What are you waiting for?  This is our rally cry.  

What do you think hit the Pentagon?

It was a global hawk spy plane and a cruise missile.

by Anonymous Citizen on Sun Jan 30, 2005 at 01:09:59 PM EST


What Now?

An open challenge to Responsible Politicians

WHAT NOW?
or
Is Anyone Paying Attention?

The war in Iraq is a White House/Corporate complicity which is spilling the blood of America's youth, a war which is being paid for
by American citizen's tax dollars, a war that has helped drive the national deficit to such a depth that our grand children will be paying for it. This is a war that was founded and has consequently floundered on flawed intelligence, White House deceptions and distortions for the monetary gain of corporations. This "mistake free"
and "fault free" administration is in a deep moral and ethical deficit of its own, by its own arrogant design.
 At minimum, three expert examiners have all come to the same conclusion. There are no weapons of mass destruction. There were no weapons of mass destruction. For the President to say that this
was not known before the troops were on the ground is an abomination of the truth. As all in Washington are well aware, there was a cacophony of voices shouting in opposition of the President's claims. Bush made a concerted effort to ignore all those who did not support his predetermined conclusions. The most pertinent source of "flawed intelligence" continues to sit in the oval office.
 What now? You all know the numbers of dead and injured Americans and Iraqis. All of you are well aware of the financial straits that this deadly farce, among others, has created. The U.S. now
borrows $1.2 million dollars per minute. The lenders of which will not keep this up forever, especially while the greenback continues on its
global dive. You've read of or have first hand knowledge of the accusations that have been corroborated concerning from whom the orders came that allowed the torture and eventual deaths of
prisoners in Abu Graib, Afghanistan and Cuba. Yet another fine showcase of Bush's democracy before the world.
 The Iraq elections are still targeted for January 30th, in spite of the fact that it has not been possible for the one hundred plus
candidates to go safely around the country to campaign; in spite of the fact that thousands of Iraqi police and election workers have quit their jobs for fear of their lives; in spite of the fact that a very large portion of the population will not be able to vote because a very large portion of the country is in utter anarchy. Why must the elections take place when George W. Bush says they must take place? What's in it for him? Points?!
 Now that the U.S. election has come and gone, will you sit on your hands for yet another three years while General Bush and his comrades continue to deceive the public with impunity? Are you going to continue to collect your inflated pay checks while Americans continue to fight and die for all the wrong reasons? How much more suffering must the Iraqi people endure before you stop putting your own petty self interests before the welfare of others? Fight the good fight. Stand up for democracy in the face of arrogant
impunity. Get off the dime and call for an impeachment now! He has earned it! The Bush Administration has given you plenty of
reasons and plenty of corroboration to warrant full congressional hearings.
 It is the responsibility of those politicians who consider accountability for their actions and decisions to be an integral part of their job description to educate the American public of the
atrocities being committed by Bush and his own band of "evil doers." Do your jobs!
 To those of you who stood on your own principles, voted on the merits of your conscience, beliefs, respect for the truth, deference to international laws, goes this American's deepest gratitude, respect and admiration. You are the foundation and the backbone of the democratic process.  

 Most sincerely, John Gambardella.               An American citizen and veteran.
                           (johnandnette@dodo.com.au)    
1/18/05

John Gambardella

by John G on Sun Jan 30, 2005 at 06:35:39 PM EST


Govt accountablity,

 Elections, Finances, Clandestine actions, are all the same problem, how to make government accountable.  The Courts and Legislative branch as failed to be the basic checks we need to balance the executive.  
  Elections can be reformed by simply going back to basic paper marked ballots and giving all time needed to count and if needed, recount the ballots completely.

by Anonymous Citizen on Sun Jan 30, 2005 at 07:31:54 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account just by filling out the form below. It's quick and free.


contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy