Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government

Government Accountability
International

Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

Baghdad Votes, DC Doesn't

This morning, after reading stories of millions of Iraqis voting for a new transitional legislature, I attended a meeting of DC Vote, an organization working to get District of Columbia residents a voting representative in the US Congress.

While we can admire the citizens of Baghdad for braving violence to get out and vote, it is painful for DC residents to watch while American troops protect the right to vote in Iraq - while in DC there is no right to vote.  In fact, expatriate citizens of Iraq living DC voted this weekend, while their neighbors have been waiting for more than 200 years to vote for a representative in Congress.

Yes, DC residents can vote for President and for their local school board and city council, but presidents rarely pay any attention to DC and without a representative in Congress, the only attention the city gets is when some Member of Congress decides to impose their views on the city by passing a law affecting only DC, blocking something the city council has done or, as happened recently, making the city pay for inaugural security costs (see my earlier blog).

There is a long, awful history of congressional domination of the city - up until home rule was passed in the 70s, a small number of racist Southern chairmen ran this largely African-American city.

DC residents pay taxes, fight and die in wars, including Iraq, many work for the federal government and most are proud to be here in the nation's capital.

DC's license plate says "No Taxation Without Representation".  That must end.  We'll be telling you more about what is being done to give the vote to thousands of DC residents. 


Tags: Action for Elections (all tags)


Display:

DC votes...or, not.....but,

As a former resident of the national capital area, I'm more than a little familiar with the complaint. But a couple of comments for perspective, maybe?

  1. As long as I've been aware of it, DC has given one solution...and one only...to this issue: they want the mid-sise city (sorry, the letter after 'y' isn't working on my keyboard!) to be declared a State; have a Governor, Two Senators, and a Representative.  And the rest of America rightly considers that 'take it or leave it' solution as b.s. I won't even waste space right now saying why.
  2. I don't think a genuine push for a truly equivalent House memer(s) for the District could be held back if planned correctly, and pushed incessantly...to the point of embarassing someone, even. But I've never seen it done in my lifetime.
  3. DC doesn't get a Senator; any more than Guam or Puerto Rico should. That's for States...which DC is not. End of story. And if that whole issue isn't dropped...than forget anything else. (IMHO).
  4. There has to be some recognition that this traditionally mis-managed city just happens to contain the Federal government of the entire country...and thus the Feds do have, to some degree (but not to every extreme congresscritter's whim) a say. What should that be? I honestly don't know.
But I'll ask you: what happens other places?  e.g, our neighbor to the North, for example?  Ottawa to my knowledge is not a crime-ridden, crack-driven failure as a stand-alone city; yet is houses the (con-)federal government.  What happens there? Any lessons...pro-or-con.....for a DC model to follow? Any other world examples?

Let's hear what the 'best practices' are as part of the process---something, again, I've never seen happen in my lifetime. Trying to solve the problem in ignorance without even knowing what the lessons learned in other places are, is, well....ignorance; and no deicison should be based on it.

Or, the simple bitching I've heard for so many years without any details for a realistic solution.  It has always masked a very honest problem that needed resolving, if only folks in DC wouldn't keep giving DC's enemies all the ammunition they need to Just Say 'No' to doing anything at all.

jp
this note was well-intentioned, if roughly worded.

by Anonymous Citizen on Tue Feb 01, 2005 at 12:56:23 AM EST


Re: DC votes...or, not.....but,

DC deserves the right to vote for both a Representative and a Senator--if not its own Senator, a Senator, any Senator.  It can time-share one if need be.  It is self-evident and intuitive that all U.S. citizens have a Senator representing them.  Period.

There is no logical reason that the Federal government should control DC's local affairs.  The whole Federal government is not located within DC's boundaries, as there are federal offices throughout the states.  No one lives in the Washington or Lincoln Memorials or the various Dept. office buildings, just as no one lives in corporate office buildings.  If the occupants of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave in D.C. can and do vote, so should the common folk.

The comparison to Puerto Rico is incongruous, and besides, Puerto Rico should be state.  It's self-evident and long-overdue.  I can't speak very specifically regarding Guam, the Mariana Islands, the U.S. Virgin Islands, or other colonial territories, but all U.S. citizens should have a Representative, a Senator and a President that they can vote for.  One Representative should be enough to speak for all citizens outside the 50 states, and would be a good start.

The reason no real progress has been made on this issue is painfully simple.  You need a Congressman to advocate for the need for a Congressman, just like you need money to make money.  The problem is how and where to begin.

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Aug 04, 2005 at 04:34:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Schwarzeneger

I don't see how you can put your faith in Governer Schwarzeneger who follows a right wing agenda.
Read the article by Peter Byrne in Salon magazine.
This man can not be trusted.
Sincerely,
Otto Schiff
PO Box 5937
Carmel, CA 93921
oschiff@sbcglobal.net

by Anonymous Citizen on Fri Feb 18, 2005 at 12:18:41 AM EST


war

I think that this war is a big waste of time and money. They can get along but I don`t know how is the one that does not want that.Maybe that one has a problem and need to go to drug rehab to get himself a checkup.

by andreea360 on Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 04:35:46 PM EST


war

US just make the situation in the conflict area worse, and in the middle of bad economy, US make big expenses for nothing.
Smith, director of menopause remedy

by smith on Sun Oct 12, 2008 at 07:14:24 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account just by filling out the form below. It's quick and free.


contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy