Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government
Government Accountability
Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

Iraq and Fitzgerald

Only because individuals inside the White House may have broken the law are we seeing any accountability for the administration's twisting of intelligence to convince the American people, erroneously, that Saddam Hussein was somehow involved in the attacks of September 11. Congress, namely Senator Pat Roberts (R-KS) who is Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, has rolled over nicely for the administration.

In the end, it is not all that surprising. That is: the lengths to which the administration had to go in order to kill any dissention within the government. The problem all along was that not every employee in the federal government is a political appointee, so the President did not have the opportunity to install his cronies in every corner of the bureaucracy. The CIA, with all of its career professionals, always had doubts about the administration's claims about Iraq, and shared them with the administration. From today's L.A. Times:

For example, CIA officials repeatedly told Cheney and others in his circle that they did not think Sept. 11 hijacker Mohamed Atta had met with Iraqi agents in Prague, Czech Republic, before the attacks. [...]

"It's been pretty well confirmed that he did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April, several months before the attack," Cheney said Dec. 9, 2001, on NBC's "Meet the Press."

The allegation was not backed up with reliable intelligence, as Cheney and his staff had been repeatedly told, according to a former CIA official. The matter was addressed in public when senators asked CIA Director Porter J. Goss during his confirmation hearings last year to assess the accuracy of Cheney's allegations.

"I don't think it was as well-confirmed perhaps as the vice president thought," said Goss, a Florida Republican who had been chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. "But I don't know what was in the vice president's mind, and I've certainly never talked with him about this. So I don't know how we came to that conclusion."

How WE came to that conclusion?! The possible indictments of White House officials in the Plame case are just a byproduct of the administration's whole Iraq marketing campaign. A campaign that has included nothing less than the wholesale misrepresentation of facts by the President and Vice President, with statements like: "It's been pretty well confirmed..." No. It hasn't.

Maybe some individuals who work in the White House, even high-ranking ones like Karl Rove, will be found guilty of going too far in the administration's campaign to sell the war in Iraq by revealing the identity of an undercover CIA agent to the press. That the possibility even exists seems indicative of the whole enterprise.

Update: From Roll Call's "Heard on the Hill" column...

House Republican leaders apparently have floated Cheney to receive the prestigious Congressional Medal of Freedom award, along with CIA director and former Florida Republican Rep. Porter Goss.


Tags: Eye on Iraq (all tags)


Display:

Iraq and Fitzgerald

After the events of Sept. 11, 2001, the American public was frightened, and a large number of us gave the Bush Administration entirely too much power, in the hope that they would make us safe from terrorists.  In the wave of patriotism which followed the attacks, anyone who opposed the Administration policies was treated as someone who was un-American, and soft on terrorism.  The Bush Administration took advantage of the trust placed in them to advance their political agenda, which included invading Iraq.  That is why the intelligence was manipulated to justify an unwise invasion, which has led to the situation in which we find ourselves.  

Lady Jane

by Spiderlily on Thu Oct 20, 2005 at 02:08:48 PM EST


Indictment Policy

Does CC have a policy on whether members of the White House staff or executive branch should step down if they are indicted?  

I know CC endorses this policy in the Congress.  Is there any reason why this should not apply to nonelected officials in the white house?  

President Bush himself once said that if anyone in the White House was indicted in this specific matter, he would expect them to step down.  

I suggest CC mount a campaign urging Congressmen to sign a letter asking the president to openly endorse this view.  Otherwise this scandal will plague the white house for the rest of its term.

The nation and the White House have much more important things to worry about than the political and legal fallout of their leaks to the press regarding the wife of a critic of evidence key to a debate that ended 2 years ago.

by Blagfly on Thu Oct 20, 2005 at 03:27:03 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account just by filling out the form below. It's quick and free.


contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy