Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government
Government Accountability
Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

Latest polls from Ohio and our radio ads.

Here are the latest polls from Ohio on issues 2, 3, 4 and 5 via the Columbus Dispatch:
Issue 2 (Early Voting)
59%Y
33%N
9% undecided

Issue 3 (Campaign Finance Reform)
61%Y
25%N
14% undecided

Issue 4 (Redistricting Reform)
31% Y
45% N
25% undecided

Issue 5 (Indep. Election Board)
41% Y
43% N
16% undecided
This is good news. Looks like 2 and 3 are up big. Issue 5 is a dead heat, and just note the number of undecided on Issue 4.  So it all looks good at this point of time. Let's hope the momentum of our ground and air campaign will get us over the hump. 

Speaking of momentum, it is definitely on the side of reformers in Ohio.  Lisa isn't blogging today ... but she just emailed me about how thousands of volunteers are going all around Ohio today, canvassing, going door to door, and calling thousands of Buckeye residents rallying them to come out and vote. We also have two radio ads. running right now through out. You can listen to them by clicking here and here (both mp3 files). So, we are doing everything we can on air and on the ground. Less than 24 hours to go till we reform Ohio.


Tags: (all tags)


Display:

Ohio issue #1

I understand your focus on issues 2,3,4,& 5 - and will vote in the affirmative tommorrow.

But ISSUE #1 is very important.  Ohio has a balanced budget amendment.  Since the Governor couldn't get his pet projet (the 3rd Frontier) funded in the budget, especially since he's been convicted while in office, the state's republicans created this piece of pork.  It authorizes 2 billion in bonds to be sold to pay for this 3rd Frontier project (which voters already voted down when given the chance last time).  3rd frontier sounds good - it's to fund high tech infrstructure, and attract high tech companies to Ohio, hence jobs.  Unfortuneately, the project has been spending billions for years without success.  But to sell this issue, they added everyones favorite flavor of pork, roads and bridge constuction, to the mix.  

When did the republicans become the party of more government spending?  Why has no one made a serious issue of this obscene spending spree they've been on nationally since 9/11?  They are bankrupting us.  Literally.

In reality the bonds will have to be paid back in 20 yrs by our children, and we already received all the raod and bridge money we requested in the most recent House Transportation Bill passed earlier this year.  

This is not how you attract creative development to Ohio.  Governor Taft is doing the same thing over and over, expecting different results.  The money not spent roads will be used for tax breaks to attract business.  Of course, they won't tell us how much get's spent for hi tech development, vs highway construction.  But I do know this..IT IS SIMPLY A WAY TO GET AROUND THE BALANCED BUDGET REQUIREMENT.  It is essentially an illegal tax.  Can't fund it in the budget?...sell bonds, hoping we'll have the money in 20 yrs to pay them off.  It looks like the folks in Ohio will pass it because they hear highway construction, which creates more valuable real estate for commercial developers, and they get stupid.  The people I've spoken to about this think it's a highway bond issue.  They've been mislead by the pro issue ads and refuse to actually read the issue for themselves.  

The real issue has been muddied by incredibly misleading ads, and a media that is too lazy to read anything but the press releases handed out in time for their deadlines.  

If only people could read and think for themselves.  What a great country we could be.

Regards, Ted P. Cincinnati, OH

by Ted Prisant on Mon Nov 07, 2005 at 06:56:34 PM EST


Latest polls from Ohio

I'm very confused by Common Cause's emphasis on the Ohio redistricting initiative and almost complete silence on the very similar California initiative.  Common Cause's Chellie Pingree made a very high-profile public announcement in support of that latter initiative, Proposition 77, about a week ago.  Has Common Cause rethought that endorsement?  Do they no longer support it?  Why is it less equal than the Ohio redistricting initiative?

by criggs on Tue Nov 08, 2005 at 09:24:47 AM EST


Re: Latest polls from Ohio

There has certainly been no lack of activity on the California redistricting effort. You can find information right at the top of the redistricting page, all over the California Common Cause page, and quite frequently on the blog, such as here and here.

Republicans don't like that we're working on redistricting in Ohio and Democrats don't like that we're working on it in California and Massachusetts. Good thing we're not in the business of being liked--just doing the common good.

by DJ Francis on Tue Nov 08, 2005 at 04:40:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Re: Latest polls from Ohio

DJ Francis wrote:  "There has certainly been no lack of activity on the California redistricting effort."

I don't find your case persuasive.  The California redistricting effort was a complete no-show in the emails you sent out in the week before Election Day, and you never used it for your emailed fundraising appeals.

The bottom line is that the California redistricting effort was less equal in your promotiion than the Ohio effort.  Why?

by criggs on Thu Nov 10, 2005 at 12:47:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account just by filling out the form below. It's quick and free.


contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy