Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government
Government Accountability
Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

Keeping Track of DeLay's Mess ...

Just when you thought ethics allegations concerning Tom DeLay couldn't get any sleazier, Peter Stone of National Journal uncovered a new DeLay fundraising scandal last weekend.  Specifically Stone delves into DeLay's close ties with Jack Abramoff, the super lobbyist, who along with his wife personally contributed $40,000 to DeLay's campaigns and ARMPAC, which is DeLay's political action committee. You will need a subscription to read the entire Stone article, but here are some of the key highlights:

From 1997 through early 2004, Abramoff and his wife personally contributed $40,000 to DeLay's campaigns and his political action committee, ARMPAC, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Further, at least two of Abramoff's American Indian tribe clients, the Louisiana Coushattas and the Saginaw Chippewas, donated $38,000 to ARMPAC.

snip

"To the casual observer, it was a pretty simple deal," recalls one former GOP House leadership aide. "Jack raised money for the pet projects of DeLay and took care of his top staff. In turn, they granted him tremendous access and allowed him to freely trade on DeLay's name."

House travel records and interviews with GOP lobbyists suggest that Abramoff curried favor with DeLay and tried to boost his clients' causes through trips. As far back as 1997, Abramoff accompanied DeLay on foreign excursions to such places as London, Moscow, and the Northern Mariana Islands. In at least one instance, on a trip to England and Scotland in mid-2000, congressional gift rules may have been violated; Abramoff apparently filed a report with his law firm showing he picked up some of DeLay's expenses.

The trip's sponsor was the National Center for Public Policy Research, a little-known conservative think tank on whose board Abramoff served until several months ago. The 2000 trip,from May 25 to June 3, mixed business with pleasure. DeLay had a meeting with former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and conservative leaders in Scotland, and played golf at Scotland's storied St. Andrews.

According to the House travel records filed by DeLay's office -- and verified separately by the center -- the center picked up roughly $28,000 in expenses for DeLay and his wife,Christine, as well as $28,000 for DeLay's then-Chief of Staff Susan Hirschmann and her husband, and $14,000 for DeLay aide Tony Rudy, who, some two years later, joined Abramoff as a lobbying partner at the firm Greenberg Traurig. Total expenses for the trip were close to $70,000.


Here is the key House rule in question:
Under House gift rules, a member, officer, or employee may not accept travel expenses from a registered lobbyist, agent of a foreign principal, or a lobbying firm. The rule stipulates that the prohibition applies even when the lobbyist, agent, or firm is later reimbursed for those expenses by a non-lobbyist client.

"It's clear from House rules that while a member may accept reimbursement for travel from certain sources, they may not receive travel expenses from a registered lobbyist, agent of a foreign principal, or a lobbying firm," said Stan Brand, a former House counsel and a partner at the law firm Brand & Frulla.


According to the report Naitonal Journal has copy of an expense voucher for that trip to England in mid-2000.

You can read about this story and all developments concerning DeLay, including civil trials involving his PAC in Texas in David Donnelly's blog - the Daily DeLay.   David has posted his take on a story in this morning's Washington Post, which is reporting how DeLay may be feeling the heat from people who matters the most - constituents from his own district. 


Tags: Government Accountability (all tags)


Display:

Need of Information

Can anyone tell me how or where I can get information on past votes of congressmen or senators?  Specifically, I want to be able to ask the people on the ethics committee who voted for Clinton's impeachment for a blowjob why they haven't voiced much concern over DeLay's various pecadillos.

by rexrober on Tue Mar 08, 2005 at 12:55:59 PM EST


Re: Need of Information

Thomas Online - http://thomas.loc.gov/

by Anonymous Citizen on Tue Mar 08, 2005 at 08:31:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]


re: Need of Information

Please send any information regarding the above referenced comment to rexrober@hotmail.com

by rexrober on Tue Mar 08, 2005 at 12:58:06 PM EST


the repugs:cheap dates

so the repubs can be bought for $70K. interesting.

by joannar on Tue Mar 08, 2005 at 01:05:00 PM EST


so what else is new!!!!!

 This is not politics but rather should be rename "politricks". This practice has always been the norm. it happens everyday.

by Anonymous Citizen on Tue Mar 08, 2005 at 01:38:20 PM EST


Tom De Lay

The House should  investigate the new allegation that DeLay illegally accepted thousands of dollars worth of travel paid for by a lobbyist now facing criminal and congressional investigations for allegedly bilking millions of dollars from casino-operating Indian tribes.

We have had it up to here with dishonest dealings!

by Anonymous Citizen on Tue Mar 08, 2005 at 05:42:39 PM EST


House investigation of delay?

It is far fetched to think that the House Ethics committee will investigate Tom Delay's use of campaign funds. After the finding by the committee in the last session of congress the Republican members that voted to reprimand him were replaced by other members, but the Speaker of the House, Dennis Haster.  The speaker stacked the committee so it won't do any more damage to Tom Delay.  But what can you say, enough voters in Delay's district voted for him to put him back in even after the House committee issued it's findings.  
    If one wants to get quick look at the handiwork of Delay and his followers take a look at a map of the congressional districts in Texas now.  They show a textbook case of gerrymandering.  

by Anonymous Citizen on Tue Mar 08, 2005 at 06:29:16 PM EST


De Lay the sleazy

I should think that even Republicans would feel
belittled by De Lay's unethical behavior, let alone his illegalities.

by Anonymous Citizen on Wed Mar 09, 2005 at 12:07:19 PM EST


Thanks so much for the comments folks

Keep them coming. Also let us know how the calls are going. Also you can see the most up to date blog postings by clicking on the "Common Blog" tab at the top or simply by going to www.CommonBlog.com

by Murshed Zaheed on Wed Mar 09, 2005 at 12:19:32 PM EST


Why is Delay's corruption being delayed ?

I have no use for dishonest people...put him behind bars where he belongs...or is his trial being delayed and put on hold so he can be pardened by his buddy GW ??

by Anonymous Citizen on Fri Mar 11, 2005 at 07:12:57 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account just by filling out the form below. It's quick and free.


contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy