Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government
Government Accountability
Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

Hands off NPR and PBS

I choose my words carefully when I tell you there's a war on, a war for the soul and integrity of National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting System (PBS).

At stake is our right to know the truth from sources who don't have to pay homage to the bottom line, and whom we've trusted for years. Just yesterday, we learned in the New York Times that the board of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), along with its chairman, Kenneth Tomlinson, told its staff that it should redirect money for NPR away from national newscasts and public affairs programming towards music programs. Tomlinson is also considering a plan to monitor Middle East coverage on NPR programs for evidence of bias, an issue particularly sensitive for the Administration.

Without citing any evidence, Tomlinson has decided that "Big Bird" leans left, despite evidence from two CPB funded polls that suggest that an overwhelming number of Americans are happy with NPR and PBS programming.

We are committed to fighting back and we need your help. Please sign our petition to protect NPR and PBS from partisan meddling and preserve what for many of our Common Cause members is a highly valued source of news and public affairs coverage:

http://www.commoncause.org/protectpublicbroadcasting

The CPB board of directors is meeting June 2 here in Washington and we want to demonstrate to Chairman Tomlinson and the rest of the CPB that we will not allow their attacks on NPR and PBS to go unchallenged. We have set a goal of 100,000 signatures to present at the board meeting. That is more signatures than we have ever collected on any issue, but with your help we know we can do it. So please sign our petition today to stop Tomlinson and rest of the CPB Board from playing politics with public broadcasting:

http://www.commoncause.org/protectpublicbroadcasting

It's ironic that the threat to the editorial independence of public broadcasting is coming from the very people entrusted to protect it from political influence. After all, shielding public broadcasting from political influence is what the CPB was designed to do when it was created almost 40 years ago.

But over the past several months Tomlinson and his Republican colleagues on the CPB have betrayed their duty to protect public broadcasting by:

  • Hiring Partisans. Tomlinson is pushing the CPB board to replace outgoing CPB President Katherine Cox with Patricia Harrison, a former co-chairwoman of the Republican National Committee.
  • Directly Seeking to Influence Programming Decisions. Tomlinson hired two "ombudsmen," reportedly representing conservative and liberal points of view to work for CPB, and help them hunt down "bias" in public radio and television shows. The dueling-ombudsmen format is "unprecedented in mainstream journalism." (Salon link, subscrip. req'd)
  • Working with the White House to sabotage efforts at reform. Tomlinson used his relationship with Karl Rove to sabotage a proposal that would have made the CPB board more professional and less partisan.
  • Targeting Journalists. Tomlinson hired a consultant to track the political ideology of guests on one PBS program, NOW with Bill Moyers. The Moyers program was singled out without informing the public, members of the CPB board, or Mr. Moyers.

Moreover, Bill Moyers has been one of Tomlinson's major targets.  This past Sunday he and I both spoke at the Media Reform Conference in St. Louis. Mr. Moyers told the crowd why this fight was so important to him and us.  He said the following:

[O]ne reason I'm in hot water is because my colleagues and I at NOW didn't play by the conventional rules of Beltway journalism.[...]

Those rules, permit Washington officials to set the agenda ... leaving the press to simply recount what officials say instead of subjecting their words and deeds to critical scrutiny. Instead of acting as filters for readers and viewers and sifting the truth from the propaganda, reporters and anchors attentively transcribe both sides of spin invariably failing to provide context, background, or any sense of which claims hold up and which are misleading.
This is the journalism Tomlinson wants to destroy at public radio and public television. Mr. Tomlinson has said he is willing to speak to Common Cause, and we will meet with him.  But words are not enough. We need your help, your voices, and the pressure of your views.  YOU REPRESENT THE core audience of public broadcasting AND WE NEED YOU to send Tomlinson's CPB a very strong message- Hands off NPR and PBS:

http://www.commoncause.org/protectpublicbroadcasting

Thank you again for all you do for Common Cause.


Tags: Media and Democracy (all tags)


Display:

Error in petition link

You've probably already been told but
your link to www.kintera.org produces an endless
loop. I'll sign the petition as soon as the link works.

by Anonymous Citizen on Tue May 17, 2005 at 01:03:22 PM EST


Re: Error in petition link

The link should be working now. Please try it again. Thanks!

by Murshed Zaheed on Tue May 17, 2005 at 01:09:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Kenneth Tomlinson and public TV/radio

Chellie Pingree's May 17 post contains a great quote from Bill Moyers that gets to the heart of the problem with TV news, but the post misses a chance to drive home that point and it also contains an error.

First, the error.  The link to "[Tomlinson's] relationship with Karl Rove" actually points to an article that does not mention Rove.  There is no evidence that Tomlinson worked "with the White House to sabotage efforts at reform", and he gave NPR's "On The Media" a credible and exonerating description of his interaction with Karl Rove.  I think Chellie Pingree's sloppiness on this point undermines her credibility.

But the quote from Bill Moyers is great and Ms. Pingree should have underlined it further.  Kenneth Tomlinson's claim that Wall Street Report is a counterbalance to Now has gone unchallenged as far as I know, and Moyers's point provides exactly the ammunition for the challenge.  There is a difference -- and it's the crucial difference -- between a reporter whose opinion is based on reporting (Moyers on Now) and an editorial board whose opinions are accountable to nobody and nothing (Wall Street Report).  

by Anonymous Citizen on Tue May 17, 2005 at 02:11:04 PM EST


Re: Kenneth Tomlinson and public TV/radio

Actually the link "[Tomlinson's] relationship with Karl Rove" goes to a New York Times site, containing the article making that point. It was written by Stephen Labaton, Lorne Manly, and Elizabeth Jensen. The title was "Chairman Exerts Pressure on PBS, Alleging Biases." It ran on A1, and had the following excerpt:
Mr. Tomlinson occassionally worked with other White House officials on public broadcasting issues. Last year he enlisted the presidential adviser Karl Rove to help kill a legislative proposal that would change the composition of the Corporation of Public Broadcasting's board by requiring the President to fill about half the seats with people who had experience in local radio and television. The proposal was dropped after Mr. Rove and the White House criticized it
The piece ran on Monday, May 2, 2005.

by Murshed Zaheed on Tue May 17, 2005 at 02:39:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Re: Tomlinson - P.N.A.C. link

I started googling the P.N.A.C. members listed here and came up with the site below about the BBG

Peter Rodman is one of the P.N.A.C. members...

 http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article53 01.htm
"So what is the Project for a New American Century? Basically it's a right-wing think tank. What makes it different is its membership. On June 3, 1997, PNAC laid out its agenda. Twenty five people signed that document: Elliott Abrams, Bill Bennett, Gary Bauer, Jeb Bush, Dick Cheney, Eliot A. Cohen, Midge Decter, Paula Dobriansky, Steve Forbes, Aaron Friedberg, Francis *censored*uyama, Frank Gaffney, Fred C. Ikle, Donald Kagan, Zalmay Khalizad, I. Lewis Libby, Norman Podhoretz, Dan Quayle, Peter W. Rodman, Stephen P. Rosen, Henry S. Rowen, Donald Rumsfeld, Vin Weber, George Weigel and Paul Wolfowitz. "

http://www.sw-asia.com/People/Bio952.htm

 BBG - Broadcasting Board of Governors:
"Veronique Rodman Appointed to the Broadcasting Board of Governors
Washington, DC., December 31, 2003--

Veronique Rodman, a public relations specialist and former television producer, has been appointed to the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), the bipartisan, nine-member board which supervises all U.S. nonmilitary international broadcasting.

President Bush nominated Rodman to the BBG on October 24, 2003, and gave her a recess appointment on Dec. 26, 2003.

"Veronique Rodman brings to the BBG an understanding of international affairs and broadcasting,"
 said Kenneth Y. Tomlinson, the BBG's chairman.

I have no country to fight for; my country is the earth, and I am a citizen of the world. Eugene V. Debs

by lazydog on Sat Jun 25, 2005 at 02:58:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]


TRUE OBJECTIVITY

Dear Fellow Common Cause Members,

Recently upon reading the newest e-mail being sent out by common cause, I find myself confused.  I usually agree with this organization on many issue from mccain-feingold to DC voting right.  But to attack Mr. Tomilson for cleaning up public radio and broadcasting is a disturbing move.  When you make statements like, "Without citing any evidence, Tomlinson has decided that "Big Bird" leans left, despite evidence from two CPB-funded polls2 that suggest that an overwhelming number of Americans are happy with NPR and PBS programming."  I find myself thinking WHO CARES WHAT AMERICANS "LIKE"!!!  This should not be the point.  I don't like reading the New
Yorker magazine but that doesn't mean it's a poor publication.  I on the other hand applaud Mr. Tomlinson.  He is taking the neccesary steps to clean up an obviously left leaning media outlet.  I am not a fan of any media that demonstrates favoritism in any political arena.  I think "editorial independence of public broadcasting," is a pretty loose fitting title for NPR.  I mean Diane Reim, Fresh Air and All things Condidered tend to not be the exact model of obejectivity.

I am sorry But I must suggest all members of Common Cause to seriously think before you sign this petition.  I know I will NOT sign it and neither should anyone who belives in balanced media outlets.

Thanks,

Andy Oetman
(Common Cause intern 5/03-8/03)

by Anonymous Citizen on Tue May 17, 2005 at 04:18:30 PM EST


Re: TRUE OBJECTIVITY

Since when is it "left" or progressive to tell the truth? Can you tell me when PBS or NPR started lying like Fox and CNN. Since when is it "left" or progressive to talk about things with some context.

Your post is just more "liberal bashing" cloaked in a resentment for favoritism. What is at issue here is that we all own one public airway and they are accountable to all of us. Quite frankly, it is the truth, and if the truth is "progressive" and you don't like it, then you don't have to watch do you?

by Anonymous Citizen on Tue May 17, 2005 at 06:47:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Re: TRUE OBJECTIVITY

The truth is certainly what's at stake here. PBS news is the last bastion of thorough, objective, evenhanded reporting, and anyone who claims otherwise is simply saying so for an agenda that will sacrifice anything to achieve it's end. Anything!

by Alfred on Wed May 18, 2005 at 03:14:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Re: TRUE OBJECTIVITY

I'm continually amazed by how terms like "obviously left-leaning" get used without any explanation or substantiation in these discussions.  Is it "obviously left-leaning" because it's different than the rest of the media, because it goes into more depth of context, or raises uncomfortable questions, or draws from historians, scholars and people with actual experience with the issues being discussed?  Or is it just because the overall prevalent political and cultural winds are shrieking from the right, thereby making anything somewhat objective or thoughtful appear "left-leaning"?  

by Ralph on Tue May 17, 2005 at 11:49:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Re: TRUE OBJECTIVITY

The middle ground between "left" and "right" is "truth".
"Truth" is neither "left" or "right", it is simply the truth. When "truth" is ignored for a particular "leaning", often enough, we all fall down.

by Alfred on Wed May 18, 2005 at 03:46:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Hey, Andy Oetman

I respect your passion for making CPB/PBS be the best it can be.  I do feel that in today's environment it seems that truth is considered a liberal value.  That's too bad.  It's correct to fault or marginalize any media that can't or won't speak only truth.  If NPR is guilty, hang 'em high.   If not, please respect the American value that we, the people, have a RIGHT TO THE TRUTH.

Perhaps we should reflect a moment on this statement:

"Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the President."
-- President Theodore Roosevelt

by David K on Thu May 19, 2005 at 01:15:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Re: TRUE OBJECTIVITY

This is an example of how the "right" can not tolerate different perspectives.  Anything that challenges the "right" gets labled as "wrong" or "left".  Please help me understand the fear of controversy? CLEAN UP?  Wipe clean?  No dialogue? What is happening?  Readers Digest does not have a reputation of scholarship or journalistic excellence.  Those terms have been more often associated with Public Radio and Public Television.  Is that what Tomlinson wants to clean up?  Is he more comfortable with mediocrity and People magazine, like some of his recent employees>

by kindlingafire on Fri May 20, 2005 at 08:26:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]


NPR's Diane Rehm Show this morning

Diane's guest at 10:00 is Ken Tomlinson http://wamu.org/programs/dr/.  She's my favorite because she's a great interviewer and she's always right on top of the issues.  You may call in questions--do!! 1-800-433-8850.  

by station wagon on Wed May 18, 2005 at 09:19:47 AM EST


Re: NPR's Diane Rehm Show this morning

Whoops! You may also email her show, drshow@wamu.org

by station wagon on Wed May 18, 2005 at 09:26:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Re: NPR's Diane Rehm Show this morning

Thanks so much for the tip. Mentioned it at the top post with link to your comment. Thanks again.

by Murshed Zaheed on Wed May 18, 2005 at 10:43:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]


The only solution I can see

I am deeply troubled by the crimes against the First Amendment being committed by the current Republican regime.  But after giving the matter much thought I can only come up with one solution.  Right Wing conservatives currently control all three branches of government.  So to whom can those of us who rely on NPR and PBS for journalistic integrity turn?  Clearly complaining to this government has repeatedly proven to be an exercise in futility.  Remember the thousands of people in those 2003 peace marches?  How successful were those exercises in democracy?

If the government cannot be relied upon to protect Public Broadcasting, then we must all stand together -- checkbooks and credit cards in hand -- and protect it ourselves.  The only way for NPR and PBS to avoid government control in the current environment is to decline government money.

It's a bitter pill, but these are bitter times.  I'd love to go to Washington and personally throw rotten tomatoes at Tomlinson and the other ideological thugs, but it wouldn't achieve my goal.  Perhaps what I'm suggesting has been their mission all along.  If so, it pains me to give them a win.  But I have to stand back and weigh the priorities.  A truly free press is more important than government financing.  

I live in Santa Monica, California -- home to KCRW, one of the strongest NPR stations in the country.  I'm going to call them right now and recommend that they sever their relationship with the CPB.  And then, despite the fact that I just lost my job, I'm going to make my second contribution of $50 for this year.

I challenge each of you reading this post to match my contribution by donating to your own local NPR or PBS stations. I look forward to hearing from you after you've done so.  

Public Broadcasting needs to be in the hands of its public.

melissaroddy@gmail.com

Sincerely, Melissa Roddy

by MelissaRoddy on Thu May 19, 2005 at 11:20:54 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account just by filling out the form below. It's quick and free.


contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy