Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government
Government Accountability
Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

Public Broadcasting -- What The Heck Is Going On?

The New York Times is on a roll.  Two weeks in a row, they've delivered some dynamite information about the Corporation for Public Broadcasting "CPB", which is supposed to fund and promote public TV and public radio. Last week, the Times magazine had a stunning interview with new CPB interim head, Ken Ferree.  Ferree, who used to work for FCC Chairman Michael Powell, confessed that he really did not watch much public TV, except for the occasional Masterpiece Theater of Antiques Road Show. He preferred the pace of People Magazine to The News Hour with Jim Lehrer.  And he did not listen to NPR because he commuted to work on his motorcycle:
Yes, Lehrer is good, but I don't watch a lot of broadcast news. The problem for me is that I do the Internet news stuff all day long, so by the time I get to the Lehrer thing . . . it's slow. I don't always want to sit down and read Shakespeare, and Lehrer is akin to Shakespeare. Sometimes I really just want a People magazine, and often that is in the evening, after a hard day.

[...]

No. I do not get a lot of public radio for one simple reason. I commute to work on my motorcycle, and there is no radio access.
Not exactly what you want to hear from the man who should be public broadcasting's most important advocate.

Today, the Times put its focus on CPB chairman Kenneth Tomlinson. Its story raises a lot of questions about Tomlinson's commitment to the fact-based investigative and substantive journalism that most of us want and new from PBS and NPR:
WASHINGTON, May 1 - The Republican chairman of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is aggressively pressing public television to correct what he and other conservatives consider liberal bias, prompting some public broadcasting leaders - including the chief executive of PBS - to object that his actions pose a threat to editorial independence.

Without the knowledge of his board, the chairman, Kenneth Y. Tomlinson, contracted last year with an outside consultant to keep track of the guests' political leanings on one program, "Now With Bill Moyers."

In late March, on the recommendation of administration officials, Mr. Tomlinson hired the director of the White House Office of Global Communications as a senior staff member, corporation officials said. While she was still on the White House staff, she helped draft guidelines governing the work of two ombudsmen whom the corporation recently appointed to review the content of public radio and television broadcasts.
Washington may be the nation's capital, but it many ways, it's a small town. So it's easy to run into people who have worked for public broadcasting who are truly worried about what's happening there. They speak of an environment that is intimidating to good work and fearless journalism.

We at Common Cause are working on a number of initiatives that we hope will improve public broadcasting. Stayed tuned.


Tags: Media and Democracy (all tags)


Display:

PBS

PBS is a dinosaur. "Fearless journalism"... what a joke.  It should not receive any public funds. If its annual public begging cannot support it, it needs to be left to die and let the few useful parts be scavenged by those who want and are willing to pay for them. It is a relic of a bygone age of a few broadcast networks. It is now just a welfare program for socialist media has beens. Even those whose ideological bent should lean toward realized it. Let it have no more tax dollars! It would be an excellent start to deficit reduction.

by helorat on Tue May 03, 2005 at 10:07:51 AM EST


Re: PBS

LOL.  Deficit reduction heh?  I assume you are not a big supporter of the current administration which has absolutely no regard for balancing the budget or reducing the gaping deficit national deficit. And also you are calling Gigot and Tucker Carlson - the socialist has beens?

Yes, PBS is so aweful.  They actually dare to share with its viewers real news, unlike those hypeventillating reporter wanna bes from the Fair and Balanced network.

by bluestreet on Tue May 03, 2005 at 10:23:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Re: PBS

Check the national treasury website...the deficit IS down...and closing rapidly. People are spending more money. Two words: Tax cuts.

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu May 05, 2005 at 08:33:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Re: PBS and US Deficit

Soory for the delayed reply, but just now found out what an ostrich you are.You need to stop watching Fox News and "When Animals Attack 27" and get the facts,

April 26, 2005 -'Federal Reserve Chairman, Alan Greenspan, told the Senate Budget Committee that the bloated US budget deficit poses a danger to the nation's economic health, and could cause the economy to "stagnate or worse".'

And the deficit projections show a shortfall of at least $200B for as far as the eye can see.

This was the week before your untrue remark.

Also, don't forget that the growing national DEBT, now accounts for $.15 of every tax dollar.

Probably Fox News hasn't got this information yet.

by pacash901 on Tue May 17, 2005 at 08:15:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Re: PBS

PBS is the only channel that has any programs
worth watching. For those that do on approve
of PBS...you have FOX, just stay with it. At the
rate this is going we will have to say "hail
Carl Rove" before we can watch tv. The amount
of funds coming for the government is minute by
all the standards of waste and corruption coming
out of this adminstration.PBS TO STAY

by Anonymous Citizen on Wed May 04, 2005 at 02:33:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Public tv and the media

Public television would be ok if the government stopped trying to use it to push agendas. Let americans see the classics and best of the arts without trying to assult us with adversity and trash or worse yet brainwash all of us....
As an example, in general, referencing all media, the news neglected to talk about the important issue happening in congress about the patriot act. It is time to put it to rest, but all the news media talked about was the "runaway bride"

by Anonymous Citizen on Wed May 04, 2005 at 11:22:12 PM EST


Re: Public tv and the media

the runaway bride is getting on my nerves! it's a private issue for crying out loud! i think it's ridiculous having so much coverage of her. if every time the nation got mad over someone doing this - we'd be mad all the time. i think we need to let this "issue" die.

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu May 05, 2005 at 08:36:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]


pbs

i don't have cable or dish...not for any reason other than preference. i watch the news hour with jim lehrer nitely. other than that i don't watch much tv. any "war" news comes from the news hour.
    i do, however, have an opinion, which is worth exactly nothing to the present administration...so, i sit by helplessly as our youth and iraqi soldiers and civilians die...and we go deeper and deeper in debt to the financial benefit of american corporations. what a nightmare! wake me when it's over!  

by Anonymous Citizen on Sun May 15, 2005 at 02:08:31 PM EST


House Subcommittee on Labor Cuts CPB budget

Why have we turned Chicken? We are being pushed around by people that have an Evangelical agenda.
CPB has served us well and fairly.I am mad as hell.I would love to know who voted to reduce the CPB budget.  Anonymous   Charlotte, N. C.

by Anonymous Citizen on Sat Jun 11, 2005 at 10:37:22 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account just by filling out the form below. It's quick and free.


contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy