Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government
Government Accountability
Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

Three Reforms to Clean Up Ohio

Little more than two weeks ago I sent out an email to our supporters about the "Coingate" political scandal, which has exposed how Ohio's top politicians have been exchanging political favors for campaign contributions. But the scandal goes much deeper, threatening democracy in the Buckeye state in a culture of systematic political corruption. These threats include:

  • The Ohio General Assembly voting to increase the amount wealthy donors can give to their campaigns by 400percent, allowing candidates to accept contributions of $10,000,
  • Partisan gerrymandering of legislative and Congressional districts allowing self-interested politicians to chose their voters, while tens of thousands of voters are left disenfranchised,
  • Partisan politicians administering elections in which they have a direct interest, while voters are left with insufficient access to the polls and unsure if election results are accurate.

We need to end this culture of political corruption today. In the wake of the deplorable Coingate scandal, the new $10,000 contribution limits and an open door to corporate contributions, Ohio needs real campaign finance reform today. After years of entrenched partisans designing districts with reelection in mind more than the interests of voters, Ohio, needs redistricting reform. And, following historically long lines and frustration with Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell serving as both chief administrator of Ohio's elections and state chair of the Bush-Cheney campaign, Ohio needs election reform.

That's why we need your immediate help today to qualify and pass a ballot initiative of three common-sense reforms that will rights these wrongs and reduce corruption in Ohio. We have just 20 days to get these reforms on the ballot, and we must gather 450,000 signatures from Ohio voters by August 1, 2005. I am asking you today to help us qualify these measures for the ballot by collecting 10, 20 or 100 signatures today. Please use our action center to email your friends, family, anyone you know in Ohio, and help put an end to the culture of corruption in Ohio:
http://www.commoncause.org/OhioTellFriends

Together, these three measures will:

  • Limit campaign contributions to $2,000 for statewide candidates and $1,000 for legislative candidates, ban corporate contributions and require full disclosure of contributions,
  • Create a truly Independent Redistricting Commission, preventing politicians from creating their own legislative districts, from making closed doors redistricting decisions, and requiring the creation of competitive legislative and congressional districts
  • Establish an independent state elections board, removing partisan politicians from the administration of state elections and allowing Ohioans to vote early and vote by mail, ensuring easy and equal access to elections.

So help us sign up Ohio residents to advocate for these measures today and invite everyone else you know in Ohio to join our cause to reform the Buckeye state. These are solid, common sense reforms that Ohioans favor, but we have to work hard to get them on the ballot this fall. Will you sign up to volunteer for the campaign? We need signature-gatherers to do our part for reform and help collect 450,000 signatures by the end of July. Please boost the efforts of our Ohio signature gathering team today. 


Tags: (all tags)


Display:

Focus on Republican Corruption

Tom DeLay was just the tip of the iceburg. The Ohio and Missouri Republican parties are so massively corrupt it is disgusting. I am working on a blog that highlights the worst of this corruption and urges actions like letters to the editor and to Congress demanding that the Republican party clean up its act.

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Jul 14, 2005 at 11:18:55 AM EST


wrong answer

Once again, Common Cause is favoring flawed redistricting reform.  By "requiring the creation of competitive... districts", Common Cause will force Gerrymandering that will put equal numbers of opposing voters into each district.  Almost 50% of all voters will be stuck in districts in which the elected representative does not represent their views.

As activists, most of us know the frustration of writing to our representative who we know disagrees with us and we know will completely disregard our opinion.  Do we want more of this, or do we want less?

Is it not better to create districts dominated by like-minded voters who are all truly represented by those they elect?

Yes, we should change how we draw districts; but do not throw out one bad system just to replace it with one that is even worse.

I have long been a Common Cause supporter, but I cannot support this.

by Anonymous Citizen on Wed Jul 20, 2005 at 01:00:15 PM EST


Drop focus on contributions

In a free country, we should be allowed to give as much money as we want to whatever cause or candidate we choose. I support fully the latter two reforms but can't give money to a group that wants to limit how I can contribute to my candidates.

by Anonymous Citizen on Wed Jul 20, 2005 at 01:48:22 PM EST


Voting machines in Ohio

If you don't eliminate the problem of electronic voting machines that undergo "adjustments" by Diebold or other Republican manufacturers, these other changes will have little effect on Ohio's corrupt elections.

by Anonymous Citizen on Wed Jul 20, 2005 at 06:37:10 PM EST


Voting Machines

It is possible to construct a voting machine that cannot be compromised without leaving a trail that it was compromised.  If compromised, a paper trail provides a way to reconstruct the vote.

The computer would use "write-once" Compact Disks for candidate information and voter choices.  The computer would not have and would not need any Random Access Memory.  It would have an Integrated Circuit chip that would provide the computer program.  It would have a display so the voter could see his choices and register his vote.  The CD would record this vote by having the name of the candidate and his office chosen written out on the CD.  Any mistakes would be corrected by obliterating this record on the CD and writing a new one.  When the voting day was over the remaining area on the CD would be written with filler so that nothing could be added.  The computer would not have any connection to the outside world except the power cord that kept a battery charged so the computer would operate.

Such a computer could be checked out before the election.  Because the computer program is written on a ROM chip no changes in the program could occur after the pre-voting day trials.  Any change would require that this ROM chip be unsoldered and replaced.

There are other safeguards that would preserve the integrity of such a voting machine.

by Anonymous Citizen on Tue Aug 02, 2005 at 07:42:29 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account just by filling out the form below. It's quick and free.


contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy