Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government
Government Accountability
Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

Direct Elect

We've all spent a lot of time complaining about how we vote and whether our vote is counted accurately and how voter suppression efforts have kept many potential voters away from the polls. There remains a lot of work to be done.

What about the Electoral College? In my view, an archaic and undemocratic institution that should be abolished and replaced with direct election of the president. Common Cause has a long-held position in favor of direct election of the president. But, over the years, efforts to amend the Constitution have failed. There are some intriguing new proposals to get to direct election - we're looking at alternatives to a constitutional amendment.

Opposition to direct elections has come from small states who believe they benefit from the Electoral College system; from traditionalists; from some minority groups who believe the system helps overcome somewhat their historical disadvantage. But most of all, those who support direct election simply don't believe it will happen.

We're interested in your comments and perspsective.



Tags: Action for Elections (all tags)


Display:

Why Pursue Direct Presidential Election?

CC shouldn't pursue direct election at any point. Even if this were a good idea, this wouldn't be the time to bring it up. From a political point of view, I see no momentum on this issue right now. Even immediately after the 2000 election, direct election wasn't popular. CC does not have the resources to pursue direct election, PPV, the Katrina Commission, state public financing, and ethics issues (DeLay, Frist, Abramoff) - all at the same time. This is already apparent from what is NOT happening on those fully developed issues. From a policy perspective, direct election of the president is a misguided idea. It always plays well to say the people should decide in this country. But this nation is a federalist democracy, not a pure democracy. The electoral college protects state interests. The Constitution has already been amended to allow popular election of the Senate. Popular election of the President might completely remove the ability of States to check an overbearing Federal government. That is not a good idea. The founding fathers and the authors of the Federalist Papers were not kidding around when they set out to prevent the abuses of tyranny by the national government. Direct election would only make this more possible.

by Anonymous Citizen on Sun Sep 25, 2005 at 11:24:54 PM EST


Re: Why Pursue Direct Presidential Election?

You're right to be concerned about our ability to fully pursue several issues at once - we're always checking our capacity and don't want to be jumping into something without the resources to do it well. As for state' rights and power, I am not sure the electoral college matters so much in that regard. The US Senate is certainly a more tangible center of power for states to assert their influence. Direct election is giving power (vote) to people - if they vote for a president who will trample on states rights, then who's to argue? But I doubt that would be the outcome.

by Ed Davis on Mon Sep 26, 2005 at 01:13:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account just by filling out the form below. It's quick and free.


contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy