Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government
Government Accountability
Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

Lobby Reform Update

Just a quick update on where things stand on the lobby reform front.

On Wednesday and Thursday the Senate danced around the issue with the intent of actually passing the lobby reform bill with or without the many amendments that have been offered to make the bill qualify as actual reform (more on this later).

Long story short: Schumer offered Dubai amendment and now bill is in limbo in the Senate, even though that issue may have been resolved now. (The House is probably going to sit around for as along as possible with the hope that they won't have to do anything.)

As far as the amendments go, Reid offered a package of changes that got voted down, although they may come back in another form. Those include: restrictions of private sector job negotiations while working on relevant legislation, increased penalties for public corruption, and better travel and gift bans.

McCain has offered an amendment that would create an Office of Public Integrity to deal with the fact that the ethics committees in both the House and Senate have not convinced the public that Congress is capable of policing itself. This amendment has the support of Obama, Lieberman and Collins.

Senator Obama has introduced a good amendment as well that would expand the definition of lobbying to include coordination activities former members of Congress provide lobbying shops without being subject to lobby restrictions because they are not physically meeting with lawmakers.

The underlying bill that came out of the committees is pretty weak, with the exception of grassroots lobbying disclosure provisions meant to catch Astro Turf operations like that of Mike Scanlon.


Tags: Ethics in Government, lobby reform, Senate, Charles Schumer, Joe Lieberman, Susan Collins, Harry Reid, John McCain, Barack Obama, astroturf (all tags)


Display:

What about Truth In Legislation?

It seems to be that as long as a congress can create massive bills with tons of obscure riders, lobbying will find a way. If each bill had to cover a single topic and was thus fully transparent, it would to seem that far fewer hidden perks would ever be voted into law! I've read about on the web defined as such: Congress could pass no measure that embraced more than one subject, and that one subject had to be clearly expressed in the bill's title. No more stuffing expenditures into package bills. Boy, this seems so commonsense that the average voter would probably even support it as a referendum issue at the state level?

by dscmailbox on Mon Mar 13, 2006 at 12:09:20 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account just by filling out the form below. It's quick and free.


contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy