Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government
Government Accountability
Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

The FBI Calls

This troubling story is from Ian Storrar, our guy from Jersey with a Scottish accent, who is exec. asst. to our president, former intern and just cool:

Sometimes you're just glad you got up in the morning. Yesterday was one of those days. I could have missed out on a very interesting call.

On March 14 Common Cause President Chellie Pingree spoke to the League of Women Voters of Berrien and Cass Counties, Michigan as part of a series of League sponsored events to celebrate Sunshine Week. Chellie mentioned the Patriot Act as part of a panel discussion on the Freedom of Information Act and Sunshine Laws. Some of her comments appeared in a local newspaper on March 17, which Special Agent Al DiBrito of the FBI in St. Joseph's, Michigan apparently read.

On the morning of Tuesday March 21, he called the President of the League of Women Voters in Berrien and Cass Counties, Susan Gilbert. He said "this Pingree woman" was "way off base" in her comments about the Patriot Act and that the League should have invited someone from the federal government to be on the panel and to respond. DiBrito then urged Gilbert to get in touch with a U.S. attorney in Grand Rapids, Michigan to learn more about the USA Patriot Act. In fact, he thought it would be a good idea for Susan to reach out to the Assistant U.S. Attorney to learn more about the Patriot Act.

Susan called me just after this call to let us know what happened. She emailed me a memo summarizing the call. We checked the facts and wrote a letter to FBI Director Robert S. Mueller to inform him of this incident and express our dismay that this was how the FBI was spending it's time and taxpayer money. We sent it yesterday by fax from Chellie and Susan, local LWV president.

I agree with Thomas Jefferson that the price of freedom is eternal vigilance, but at a time when the FBI is already under scrutiny for failure to respond to terror suspects I have to question the value of Agent DiBrito's line of inquiry. Intelligence resources are limited. Was Chellie's appearance really a threat to national security, or a crime that needs the FBI's attention? When two respected and well established organizations like Common Cause and the League of Women Voters come under what amounts to intimidation, for a public and open discussion, something is going wrong.


Tags: Government Accountability (all tags)


Display:

Common Cause fears the truth

So here we go again with the manipulation by Ed  Davis.  As most people who are aware of the League of Women Voters (LWV) know, this is a Liberal Left-wing group as is Common Cause.  More than likely, Common Cause President Chellie Pingree (who is a former Democratic politician from Maine) stated some information that wasn't true or accurate (probably something negative) and this is the reason for Special Agent Al DiBrito's communication.  Rather than invite the U.S. Attorney to one of their meetings to clarify the Patriot Act, CC and LWV immediately make accusations of INTIMIDATION and write a letter to try to get this agent in trouble. LWV and CC of course are relying on the irrationality and emotion of most people to keep from getting told the truth about the Patriot Act.

Ed then goes on say: "Was Chellie's appearance really a threat to national security, or a crime that needs the FBI's attention?"

That depends on what Chellie is telling people. When someone is trying to subvert a government or a policy they usually spread misinformation about that government or policy as a way to get people against it, they depend on the fact that most people will believe what they're told and not find out for themselves. Like sheep lead to slaughter

This no-talent hack (Ed Davis) then continues his drivel:
"When two respected and well established organizations like Common Cause and the League of Women Voters come under what amounts to intimidation, for a public and open discussion, something is going wrong."

1) League of Women Voters a respected organization? Who are you kidding??  

2)An FBI agent contacts you and suggests you get your facts straight and you call that INTIMIDATION?

3) A public and open discussion you say?? Why don't you have another "Public and Open discussion" with someone who can counter what your saying instead of the one-sided monologue you gave?????

by La Perla on Wed Mar 22, 2006 at 10:33:00 PM EST


Re: Common Cause fears the truth

Chellie Pingree did not say anything inaccurate or misleading at the event - those who have implied this have not referred to what she said, only their presumptions.

In what countries do people have to get the government's opinion in a debate?

That sounds like the former Soviet Union; the People's Republic of China; Belarus since Lukashenka.

In what situations is it the role of security and intelligence organizations within governments to act as the mouthpiece of the government?

Sounds like the Politburo of the Soviet Empire or the KGB in Belarus.

Nobody is trying to subvert government policy - it was a panel discussion (open to anybody who wanted to go) about freedom of information and open government.    It is the right and duty of all citizens to engage in debate and discussion of what the people's government does.  The event was part of a week dedicated to people being able to find out what the government is doing in their name.  How can participants in that be accused of depending "on the fact that most people will believe what they're told and not find out for themselves?"  The government and the FBI are not exactly short of opportunities to give their side on the Patriot Act.  There are enough journalists in the TV, radio and print media who support the act that I don't lose sleep about whether government policy is given a fair hearing.

Whether La Perla respects Common Cause or the League is not of particular concern.  The facts are that Common Cause is a 35 year old grassroots organization with 300,000 members and supporters in all 50 states, 38 state chapters and a strong record of non-partisan work to hold government accountable to the people.  The League of Women Voters is over 85 years old, with over 900 local and state Leagues which also work to promote openness in government on a non-partisan basis.  I can think of many people who have respect for them and us.

by Ian Storrar on Fri Mar 24, 2006 at 12:39:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Re: Common Cause fears the truth

Hello again La Perla and others:

The Patriot Act contains broad legal language, disguising the real scenarios threatened under its merciless and unchecked abuses. It would be easy to be fooled by a meeting in which lying government officials talk.

I want to add that I, myself, lived at the border of the Iron Curtain: When I talk about increasing strangleholds on us, the people, and basically on brain-fucking the masses with "philosophy" and "protections" and every "good cause" in the book, I am not theorizing: I really know what I am talking about!

by Freedom Ringer on Thu Apr 06, 2006 at 02:02:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Re: Common Cause fears the truth

La Perla,
You are publicly confessing ignorance.

Democracy is founded on the principal of freedom of speech, and freedom of expression. You are calling "temper tantrums" and basically saying "ohh baby poo-poo" to something so critical , which you yourself would not even want to be in loss of: Your freedom to think and talk! Imagine if people showed up at your door and could haul you away, torture you,----they can, you know, under the Patriot Act*---just because of what you right now wrote to Common Cause.

Any time the government intercepts the free communication of people, there is danger. People who have not lived at the Iron Curtain don't always "get" this, and obviously, you REALLY don't! In fact, you are in support of fascist murderers, or so it would appear. Ooooh yes, they ARE murderers, and this is  not conspiracy theory, either! Have you looked at the content of the Patriot Act? Do you know that people may be arrested without probable cause, detained without access to legal counsel, and that death penalties are expanded WITHOUT Congressional or judicial oversight? What does this have to do with the FBI calling Common Cause??? EVERYTHING!! It is a dictatorial clamp-down on freedom of speech, with much further action threatened on the "legal" (if not unconstitutional) horizon. So go ahead, call this a "temper tantrum" if you like, but my words to you are: Get yourself a heart, and use your brain! Perhaps you might even consider a that a psychiatric evaluation is in order! I am not kidding. Are you a member of the Government, by the way? Sure sounds like you are one of them. You all need to be removed from office, as incompetent and criminal as---well, ALMOST--- each and every one of you are.

by Freedom Ringer on Thu Apr 06, 2006 at 01:37:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Since when is this the FBI's job?

The last time I checked, it's not the FBI's job to call private associations and criticize them for having public forums on issues of vital public interest. Their priorities are:
  1. Protect the United States from terrorist attack.
  2. Protect the United States against foreign intelligence operations and espionage.
  3. Protect the United States against cyber-based attacks and high-technology crimes.
  4. Combat public corruption at all levels.
  5. Protect civil rights.
  6. Combat transnational and national criminal organizations and enterprises.
  7. Combat major white-collar crime.
  8. Combat significant violent crime.
So when Special Agent Dibrilo says that he was calling to correct "some information that wasn't true or accurate" which one of these priorities does this fall under? Perhaps you "protect" civil rights by violating them.

by rikomatic on Thu Mar 23, 2006 at 10:46:46 AM EST


Re: Since when is this the FBI's job?

rikomatic,  

   Although your argument seems fairly well researched, I would have to say that if, as I suspect that the CC President (who is a Democrat) was giving misinformation about the  Patriot Act then that would fall under number 4: "Combat public corruption at all levels."  Common Cause has become a fairly powerful and influential left-wing organization so if someone with power like Ms. Pingree is attempting to undermine our national security by lying to people. Then this is an FBI issue.  And it is everyone's business to fight against people who are intentionally deceiving others for their own political purposes and therefore any citizen of this country including the FBI agent (who is an American Citizen)has the right to demand the truth be told.

If Ms. Pingree has nothing to conceal then why doesn't she post, word for word exactly what she said at the meeting, then we can examine this for ourselves?

Although I must say one thing in favor of Ed Davis, I did get quite a laugh from his comment about the League of Women Voters being a respected organization.  

by Nadersupporter on Fri Mar 24, 2006 at 12:32:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Re: Since when is this the FBI's job?

Hi Nadersupporter -- You can read exactly what Chellie said about the Patriot Act in The Herald Palladium's coverage of the panel discussion.

by Dawn Holian Iype on Fri Mar 24, 2006 at 08:41:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]


reply

Both Artz and Leliaert spoke about the role of the news media in a democracy.  Leliaert said he is concerned that media staffing cuts are leaving fewer reporters to cover government meetings.  He also said he sees a "healthy tension" between media and government, with the two cooperating as much as confronting each other. nexium

by galin on Thu May 24, 2007 at 11:50:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]


FBI letters

I was at this meeting it Common Cause did a great job at presenting the information.

It is very common in this area for the local government to intimidate outspoken residents.  So I wasn't surprised that it went to this level.

I am proud of the presentation at the forum and hope that Common Cause continues to stand up for what is right.

Howard

by ropesman on Thu Mar 23, 2006 at 11:07:57 PM EST


Liberals gone wild!

You on the left have all lost your mind! I have been to the "government sponsored" speech on the Patriot Act. It was very informative. At the end of the speech, the Assistant U.S. Attorney asked that he be given the chance to speak when we saw local organizations railing against the Patriot Act. Seems to me, someone has a problem with freedom of speech, and it isn't the government! Sounds more like Common Cause President Chellie Pingree doesn't want anyone to oppose her opinion. How can anyone make an informed decision with out all the information? Keep it up! No wonder the Republicans keep winning.

by codenameright on Fri Mar 24, 2006 at 09:43:48 AM EST


Re: Liberals gone wild!

It is really interesting to me to see just how consistently, the game called "psychological projection" is a rampant dynamic among you "righties".

YOU aren't opposed to free speech? Just re-read what you wrote! And the government is NOT clamping down on free speech, are you kidding? That is just the point: Government has no business (at least in a supposedly free country) to call and offer to "educate" the people (better known as lying and brainwashing). Even if it was a sincere and honest "education", the point would still remain the same: People must be left OFFICIALLY free to think for themselves. Once again, like all other Republicans I have seen, you are publicly confessing ignorance and incompetence. It is shocking to me! Don't you realize, that any time the government controls philosophy, analysis, etc that controls become more and more stringent? Don't you know that little bits of well-intended powers become increasingly oppressive, ultimately even murderous? Conspiracy theory?? Oh yeah??? Just look at the Patriot Act, at legalized torture, at secretive wiretapping: Are YOU out of your mind?? Psychological projection, once again: You Repubs are very, very good at that!

Did it ever occur to you, that in looking out for civil rights, we are trying to protect YOU, too? Same team, folks! "A house divided against itself cannot stand" --Abraham Lincoln

by Freedom Ringer on Thu Apr 06, 2006 at 01:48:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]


the so-called "patriot act"

I applaud Chellie Pingree for publicly criticizing the so-called "Patriot Act" and also for standing up to the FBI.

Thirty-five years ago this month, a group calling itself the Citizens Commission to Investigate the FBI broke into the agency's office in Media, Pa., and removed hundreds of files documenting its policy of surveillance, infiltration and harassment of civil rights and anti-war activists.

Thanks to the efforts of those patriotic Americans, newspaper articles based on the documents prompted Congress to hold hearings on some of the illegal activities engaged in by the FBI and the CIA. Unfortunately, recent revelations have shown that the reforms subsequently adopted by Congress to prevent such abuses were not successful.

The FBI is still spying on whistle-blowers, peace activists and other patriotic Americans, not because they pose a threat to national security, but because they oppose U.S. government policies. The truth is, there never would have been a need for the "Patriot Act" if the FBI had done its job in the months leading up to 9-11.

If the FBI would spend more time preventing crime and less time covering up its illegal activities, patriotic Americans would feel free to exercise their First Amendment rights to freedom of expression without having to worry about being placed under the type of surveillance authorized by the "Patriot Act."

by palomine on Fri Mar 24, 2006 at 02:54:12 PM EST


Out of Kindness , I Suppose.....

Agent Dibrito's improper conduct is flat- out unacceptable in the United States whether  the targets of his harassment are "long established " & "well respected " organizations OR brand new citizens' associations w/o any public reputations to speak of yet!  

Ed Davis' kindly characterization of this thuggish  behavior as something that "amounts to intimidation " goes  way to E-Z on the  Feebs.  I'm thinking  a letter of apology and a month off @ 1/2 pay  would be about right if there are any competent supervisor's listening in (?) .... Maybe some ACTUAL public service thrown in for good measure would go a small distance toward  restoring public confidence in the Western Michigan outpost of these bumbling Federales ?      

                              - shocked electrician in Detroit

by John A Joslin on Sun Mar 26, 2006 at 09:20:09 PM EST


FBI intimidation

You'll are missing the point. The First Amendment says: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

I don't see anything in there that you can only speak the truth, or that the government has the right to monitor what you say to make sure that it is "fair" or "true". It doesn't matter what alignment the group or the speaker has. The FBI was WAY out of line and I find this incident chilling. Essentially, you can say what you like when you like, with only a few exceptions such as yelling fire in a crowded theatre.

Ernie in Texas

by eewilde on Tue Mar 28, 2006 at 08:10:35 PM EST


hope

I hope that Common Cause continues to stand up for what is right.
----
thanks to weight loss i am not a fatty anymore.

by sehebre on Fri Apr 06, 2007 at 03:09:12 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account just by filling out the form below. It's quick and free.


contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy