Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government
Government Accountability
Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

Some Random Thoughts

Because ethics makes for such good political fodder, the `culture of corruption' in Washington will certainly be a central issue in the 2006 mid-term elections, like it was in 1994. Unfortunately, however, a willingness to decry unethical behavior in Congress does not translate into a commensurate enthusiasm for reform. Both Democrats and Republicans have been resistant to strengthening ethics rules in Congress during one of the worst Congressional scandals in history. Many members continue to characterize genuine reform proposals as an overreaction to the scandal, regarding the public's cynicism as a passing condition. As such, the ethics and lobbying reform packages Congress has proposed for itself lack the basic reforms that will reverse the `anything goes' culture that has developed.

Meanwhile, the costs to the American people of corruption in Washington are clear. From defense contracts, for even highly-classified national security work, that have been granted through the secretive process of earmarking in return for lavish gifts; to the redistricting of one of the largest states in the country, foreclosing the possibility of competitive Congressional elections; to a corruption scandal that touches so many members of Congress that only the war in Iraq is considered a bigger problem facing our country - ethics is at the heart of how Congress does its business. Yet, it is one of the hardest things to change.

The process for enforcing the internal rules of Congress is an inherently conflicted process. Members of Congress must investigate their colleagues, even when the subject of the investigation may be a powerful member of Congress, such as Majority Leader DeLay. This has led to the complete irrelevance of the ethics committees in both the House and Senate as effective watchdogs of Congressional behavior. The committees have failed to make any difference during the Abramoff scandal and have lost all public confidence. The system of ethics oversight in Congress is as much to blame for the current scandal - and its subsequent costs - as anything else.


Tags: Government Accountability, Ethics in Government, Redistricting, Earmarking, Contracting (all tags)


Display:

a random thought about the immigration problem

This comment was taken from a newspaper in Arizona

Rally against Mexico

After reading letters to the editor and watching kids march under the Mexican flag, it saddens me that the parents are not telling kids the truth as to why they're here. So I will try:
oe If your parents came here illegally, they had no choice. If you're poor in Mexico, your life is useless to the Mexican government. How sad to be forced from your homeland.
oe Now that your parents have a job, they're important to Mexico because of the money they send back.
oe The Mexican government's actions constitute human rights violations - supported by religious and civil rights groups that won't speak out against these violations. (They don't want to appear racist, which is what they call people who don't agree with them.)
oe Mexicans who die in the desert on U.S. soil are still murder victims of the Mexican government.
Mexican families know they have it better here. How about protesting the way the Mexican government treats your family and friends back home? Let's see if you're important then.
FREDDY ALVAREZ

by el profeta misterioso on Thu Apr 20, 2006 at 07:11:45 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account just by filling out the form below. It's quick and free.


contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy