Although we are very interested in a non-partisan process for drawing district lines, our experience with the Republican dominated politics in Ohio and their so-called reform agendas that has resulted in sham campaign finance reform and election reform, leaves us a little gun shy about this Republican proposal for redistricting reform.

However, as redistricting reform is so important we will continue to work with our partners and the legislature to bring about real reform..  It has been said that the redistricting process is often more determinative of who wins elections than the voting in elections itself.  Another by product of partisan redistricting, according to Herb Asher, political science professor emeritus at The Ohio State University, is a dearth of moderate, centrist politicians more open to compromise.

Common Cause/Ohio considers independent redistricting an important goal, but we will reserve judgment on supporting this proposal until we see the final product and have a chance to consult with experts on its viability and possible consequences.

The Columbus Dispatch (April 25, 2006) has editorialize in favor of the plan, but says that a key detail for the Democrats is how much competitiveness should be in the process, The article reminds us that voters rejected a redistricting proposal in November that would have made competitiveness the foremost component of the plan.  But they also admit that "Political factors also are in play."