Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government
Government Accountability
Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

Common Cause turns 36

On this day, 36 years ago, John Gardner issued an announcement from his office at the Urban Coalition Action Council, located one block from where I write today.  In it, Mr. Gardner proclaimed that he was launching a new membership for Common Cause, "a nationwide, independent, non-partisan organization for those Americans who want to help in the rebuilding of the nation."  Indeed, on August 18th 1970, this was a nation in great need of rebuilding and because of Mr. Gardner's tremendous effort and dedication, Common Cause, the United States' first "Citizens' Lobby" continues to do just that today.

The press release that Mr. Gardner issued outlined some of the reasons for Common Cause's creation as well as some objectives he had for its purpose.  By way of reasons, he wrote that although the citizens of 1970's America recognized that their nation's priorities needed changing, "they (didn't) know how to go about it."  Common Cause, therefore was designed, "to assist you speak and act in [sic] behalf of the legislation designed to solve the nation's problem."

Mr. Gardner, in effect, sought to hold public officials accountable for their decisions, "we want weak public officials to know that they will be subject to criticism.  We want strong and concerned representatives to know that their efforts are appreciated." He, like millions of Americans at the time, had grown very fearful that, "most parts of the system (had) grown so rigid that they cannot respond to impending disaster."  It is in this last phrase that we see what a long fight Mr. Gardner was preparing his organization for, as the same complaint still echoes through the public today.  

Similar coincidences should be noted of Mr. Gardner's announcement.  Primarily the fact that at the heart of Common Cause's inception was a response to the outcry generated over the seemingly pointless continuance of hostilities in Vietnam.   "We believe," he writes, "there is great urgency in ending the Vietnam War on a scheduled timetable.  We believe there must be a major reordering of national priorities.  We believe the problems of poverty and race must be among our first concerns."

It begs the question; if John Gardner were here to evaluate his proud organization 30 years after its creation, would he remark on how different the world had become or how eerily similar?


Tags: John Gardner, Common Cause (all tags)


Display:

Yay!

Happy Birthday to us!

by Kirstin Ellison on Fri Aug 18, 2006 at 03:27:42 PM EST


How about a party favor?

A new debate requirement for primary elections.

This new policy would apply to the Democratic Party, the Republic party and any other party that has closed primary elections.

All parties that have closed primary elections must be required at least one debate that occurs at least one week prior to the primary election. One debate must include all candidates; subsequent debates can be more selective.

Implementation:
When each candidate applies to be on the ballot, she must agree to participate in at least one debate, organized by the state party. If the candidate does not attend the debate, she will be removed from the ballot.

Thoughts?

by BeastofBurden on Sat Aug 26, 2006 at 04:55:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Debates

Personally, I think debates are a great thing, and would love to see more candidates participating.  

However, I doubt that politicians would be amenable to rules such as this one - especially the ones who know their public speaking weaknesses.

by Kirstin Ellison on Wed Aug 30, 2006 at 03:17:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Mandating Debates

Some public financing programs do encourage or require candidates to participate in debates. (New York City is one such example.) 

Of course, it would also be nice if the TV and radio stations who get their licenses to use our public airwaves for free actually carried these debates when they happen.

by Dawn Holian Iype on Wed Aug 30, 2006 at 03:43:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]


It's nice to know...

That some things in the volunteer room are older than me (other than the desks... and possibly the computers, heh).

It's pretty amazing that we face many of the same issues today that Mr. Gardner railed against 35 years ago... how far we've come, eh?

by jparis on Fri Aug 18, 2006 at 03:31:12 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account just by filling out the form below. It's quick and free.


contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy