Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government
Government Accountability
Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

We must Get It Straight in 2008

Cross posted on Talking Justice.

One year from now, we'll be at the climax of the longest and most expensive federal campaign cycles in history, looking in our national rearview mirror at a $1 billion presidential race and another $1 billion spent on races for the House and Senate.

One billion dollars.  The vast majority of it will come from wealthy donors writing large checks, no doubt demanding access to and influence on the winners once they sit behind their desks in Congress, or in the Oval Office. And who will say no to them? Those newly re-elected or newly elected lawmakers will already be worried about finding money to run their next campaign. That is how the fundraising arms race works.

Put all that fundraising activity against the backdrop of our national needs.

We need a solution to the health care crisis, a plan to address global warming, an honest debate on our foreign policy, and much more. The last thing we should have is members of Congress spending more than 30 percent of their time and energy fundraising. I'm not interested in watching another year of endless political money raising, as average voters feel further alienated from their own democratic government.

We need to Get it Straight in 2008. We won't be able to address health care or global warming without removing the influence of big money in politics. So that's what we must do. Public financing of campaigns, or "Fair Elections," allows candidates who show a broad base of public support to receive public funding to run a competitive campaign. Once in office, those same candidates feel accountable to the voters of their district, not their major donors. Imagine electing our legislators based on ideas and appeal to voters, rather than on who can raise the most money. That's not a bad picture.

Maine, Arizona, and Connecticut already use voluntary, full public financing systems for all of their statewide races. But to Get it Straight in 2008 we can't stop there. We need to change the way we finance campaigns across this country, from cities to states to Congress, where the bipartisan Fair Elections Now Act was introduced this year by Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL) and Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA).

Just over a week from now, Nov. 12-16, is Fair Elections Action Week, when people and organizations from around the country that support public financing will take actions to show their support for this ultimate campaign finance reform.

If you agree we need action on health care, global warning, education and other critical issues, please join us in showing you want a change. Join the campaign to make Fair Elections Action Week a step toward a fairer democracy in which all voters--regardless of the size of their wallets--have an equal voice. You can simply sign your name in support, or choose an activity that will be going on somewhere near you to show your support.


Tags: Get It Straight in 2008, Fair Elections, Money in Politics, public financing, clean elections (all tags)


Display:

You are missing what's really needed!

While this, and other concerned groups' campaign finance reform initiatives, appears to address the issues regarding undue influence through campaign contributions, they all do little or nothing to actually solve the problem.  I am referring to the 1,000 lbs. gorilla in the room, that all of these initiatives still give the candidates the ability to choose not to accept the public campaign funds offered.  So, what's new?  The current system already makes public funds available; the catch is, like all of the reform initiatives currently being proposed, if the candidate agrees to take the public funds they are prohibited from taking private donations, and as we all can see, no candidate opts for that because it would limit their fund raising ability.  So what I'm saying is this; unless a campaign reform initiative requires the candidates to use only public funds, while making all private donations to candidates illegal, there missing the mark on what is truly required to vanquish influence pedaling and put our government back in the hands of the people where it belongs.  

by jgdimas on Mon Nov 05, 2007 at 11:52:20 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account just by filling out the form below. It's quick and free.


contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy