Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government
Government Accountability
Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

John Doolittle speaks

Sunday's Auburn Journal carried an op-ed by Rep. John Doolittle (R-CA) in which he maintains his (and his wife's) innocence) and decries how the FBI search was handled.  In his own words:

Next month will mark three years since the government first contacted Julie with questions about her work for Jack Abramoff. Since then, Julie has been responsive to every request that the government has made of her. Despite that fact, we have been subjected to leaks by the government, which in turn have led to irresponsible speculation and sensationalized reporting by the media, which in turn has led to the erosion of support and trust of my constituents.

All of this activity culminated in last month's unnecessary search of our home which I am convinced had much more to do with an attempt to intimidate us and garner media attention than the pursuit of the truth.

Doolittle provides details of the search to back up his claim:

Even though the search warrant only pertained to items related to Julie's business, agents seized many personal items that clearly had no relevance to their investigation.

Julie's personal journals, sensitive information about our two children, phone lists and personal files were all taken and have yet to be returned. They even took her mobile phone and Ipod.

However, what is more revealing about the government's motives is what they left behind.

While the agents were busy rummaging through our personal items, they failed to take an accordion file with information about the work Julie did for Jack Abramoff, all of which was legitimate and legal.

His conclusion from all this:

I do not believe it was a coincidence that the leak came the day before Attorney General Alberto Gonzales testified before Congress on charges that his office was overly partisan in its firing of eight U.S. Attorneys, especially considering Gonzales specifically cited his recent prosecution of Republican members of Congress as evidence to the contrary.

In my mind, these events clearly indicate that there was more behind the search of our home than the pursuit of justice. As such and while my political opponents work to exploit this incident to further propagate speculation of my guilt, I ask my constituents to withhold judgment and stand with me in protecting my right and that of my wife to the presumption of innocence while we work to ensure that the truth is revealed.

He's right - he's entitled to a presumption of innocence in the eyes of the law.  But I'm not sure I would agree that he's entitled to the same in the eyes of the public; his ties to Jack Abramoff are long and storied, and it's hard to get past them or dismiss them as irrelevant.  In the end, we may learn that John and Julie Doolittle did not break any laws - but that doesn't mean they didn't betray the public's trust all the same when it came to their dealings with Abramoff.


Tags: John Doolittle, Ethics in Government, Abramoff, Julie Doolittle (all tags)


Display:

You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account just by filling out the form below. It's quick and free.


contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy