Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government
Government Accountability
Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

Ethics Changes Remain Stuck - For Now

People often say that Congress only makes big changes when faced with consensus or crisis. This must be the reason why we have no progress to report today on ethics reforms.

Apparently, there's no consensus to produce an ethics and lobbying reform bill or a revamped House ethics process. And there must not be a crisis -- notwithstanding the recent indictment of Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) ongoing federal investigations involving Reps. Rick Renzi (R-AZ) and John Doolittle (R-CA) and the recent news that Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) had been hanging out with alleged prostitutes. Nah, just business as usual on the Hill.

But as members have the aroma of jet fumes dancing in their heads -- the month-long August recess is approaching -- there may be a new ethics and lobbying reform bill in the next two weeks.

Both the House and Senate passed lobbying and ethics reform bills this year, largely in response to the indictments and scandals of the past few years. But they couldn't send the bills to conference because of objections from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC). They held up the bills in an effort to gut disclosure of lobbyist fundraising activities and ban congressional earmarks.

 

So now, House and Senate Democratic leaders plan to try again by writing a new ethics and lobbying reform bill. Roll Call reports today that negotiations are under way on a single bill, similar to the ones passed by the House and Senate, that would avoid conference if both houses approve it without amendments. Despite problems with a portion of the bill, both chambers are expected to vote on it and send it to the White House before the August recess.

The bill should pass the House easily but will have a rougher time in the Senate. DeMint and a group of conservative Republicans are threatening a filibuster if Democrats alter some of the earmark reforms in the bill.

The outlook is equally uncertain for the House ethics task force that was supposed to decide what changes to make to investigations of alleged ethical misconduct.

A group of freshman House Democrats are considering their own proposal, largely out of frustration that task force leaders Michael Capuano (D-MA) and Lamar Smith (R-TX) have put forth no official recommendation, nearly three months after their May 1 deadline. Capuano says the task force is making progress but does not expect to make its final recommendations before the August recess. However, one recommendation that is widely anticipated would allow outside groups and individuals to file complaints against lawmakers, the procedure the House had in place before 1997.

The House freshmen are considering an alternate proposal to reform the ethics process; others had endorsed a proposal by Rep. Baron Hill (D-IN) that would have eliminated the House Ethics Committee and replaced it with an independent, bipartisan commission.


Tags: Ethics in Government, William Jefferson, David Vitter, Michael Capuano, Lamar Smith, Baron Hill, John Doolittle, Rick Renzi, Jim DeMint, Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell (all tags)


Display:

You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account just by filling out the form below. It's quick and free.


contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy