Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government

Government Accountability
International

Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

Half the Story

Colorado Newspapers

In an article in The Denver Post yesterday, Aldo Svaldi laid out some interesting information about the reasons why our newspapers are slowly consolidating into a few large hands.

Print newspapers' advertising sales are expected to drop $4.7 billion this year, down to levels last seen in 1996, Deutsche Bank analyst Paul Ginocchio recently predicted.

Publishers can pursue several strategies to avoid default, including selling off assets, raising outside capital or cutting costs to boost their cash flow.

The second part of this story is the impact this kind of change has on democracy. As our newspapers, radio stations and TV stations have gone from many to few, so have the perspectives that are critical in a democracy.

Since 1995, the number of companies owning TV stations has gone down 40%. Since the 1996 Telecommunications Act, Clear Channel has been able to go from the previous 40 radio station limit to owning over 1,200 stations nationwide.

The result has been infotainment, less local news and much of the same pre-packaged content being consumed all over the country.

Although there are real economic reasons for these vast changes, diversity in media ownership has to be a priority.

Ownership limits have to be restored and communities need to find innovative ways to create and maintain local media.


Tags: Colorado, media and democracy, Denver Post, MediaNews, Aldo Svaldi, in the states (all tags)


Display:

media is not just another industry

There's a key point that any business report about media profits always fails to get.

There is a reason that the press was explicitly given rights under the First Amendment of our Constitution. The work they do is a public good, but should NOT be done by the government.

Thus, it is imperative that the media be looked upon as a different business model than widgets and sprockets.

we need the media to be healthy, diverse and independent if our democracy is to survive.

by Jon Bartholomew on Fri Jun 20, 2008 at 09:16:06 AM EST


Clear Channel again the target of Liberal Cause

As most of us know, Common Cause is a front group for the Democratic Party, and its members consist of nothing but liberals, including Jon Bartholomew.  The reason why Clear Channel is the usual target (just like FOX News is a target) is because it has a conservative bias. If Clear Channel had a liberal bias, then you wouldn't see it's name posted on this site.

by Adan on Sun Jun 22, 2008 at 02:26:08 PM EST


diversity of voices

Common Cause is proudly nonpartisan.

A larger issue is the influence any single company can have on the larger population, whether or not it is biased in any direction.

Liberal, conservative or objective matters little if it is the only perspective we're getting!

by Katie Fleming on Mon Jun 23, 2008 at 03:19:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]


right

Adan, you just keep telling yourself that.

by Jon Bartholomew on Mon Jun 23, 2008 at 02:01:34 PM EST


economic crysis

i wonder about the number in this economic crysis. how much it be?
jordy, programmer of free coloring book

by jordy on Fri Dec 19, 2008 at 07:02:17 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account just by filling out the form below. It's quick and free.


contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy