Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government
Government Accountability
Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

red arrow Common Blog

Don't Cross KBR

From this morning's Times ...

The Army official who managed the Pentagon's largest contract in Iraq says he was ousted from his job when he refused to approve paying more than $1 billion in questionable charges to KBR, the Houston-based company that has provided food, housing and other services to American troops.

The official, Charles M. Smith, was the senior civilian overseeing the multibillion-dollar contract with KBR during the first two years of the war. Speaking out for the first time, Mr. Smith said that he was forced from his job in 2004 after informing KBR officials that the Army would impose escalating financial penalties if they failed to improve their chaotic Iraqi operations.

Army auditors had determined that KBR lacked credible data or records for more than $1 billion in spending, so Mr. Smith refused to sign off on the payments to the company. "They had a gigantic amount of costs they couldn't justify," he said in an interview. "Ultimately, the money that was going to KBR was money being taken away from the troops, and I wasn't going to do that."

General News :: Entry Link :: Comment
Tags: Iraq, contracting, government accountability, whistleblower (all tags)

Some Random Thoughts

Because ethics makes for such good political fodder, the `culture of corruption' in Washington will certainly be a central issue in the 2006 mid-term elections, like it was in 1994. Unfortunately, however, a willingness to decry unethical behavior in Congress does not translate into a commensurate enthusiasm for reform. Both Democrats and Republicans have been resistant to strengthening ethics rules in Congress during one of the worst Congressional scandals in history. Many members continue to characterize genuine reform proposals as an overreaction to the scandal, regarding the public's cynicism as a passing condition. As such, the ethics and lobbying reform packages Congress has proposed for itself lack the basic reforms that will reverse the `anything goes' culture that has developed.

Meanwhile, the costs to the American people of corruption in Washington are clear. From defense contracts, for even highly-classified national security work, that have been granted through the secretive process of earmarking in return for lavish gifts; to the redistricting of one of the largest states in the country, foreclosing the possibility of competitive Congressional elections; to a corruption scandal that touches so many members of Congress that only the war in Iraq is considered a bigger problem facing our country - ethics is at the heart of how Congress does its business. Yet, it is one of the hardest things to change.

The process for enforcing the internal rules of Congress is an inherently conflicted process. Members of Congress must investigate their colleagues, even when the subject of the investigation may be a powerful member of Congress, such as Majority Leader DeLay. This has led to the complete irrelevance of the ethics committees in both the House and Senate as effective watchdogs of Congressional behavior. The committees have failed to make any difference during the Abramoff scandal and have lost all public confidence. The system of ethics oversight in Congress is as much to blame for the current scandal - and its subsequent costs - as anything else.

General News :: Entry Link :: 1 Comment
Tags: Government Accountability, Ethics in Government, Redistricting, Earmarking, Contracting (all tags)


State Issues
RSS Feeds
contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy