On the ethics beat
By Josh Zaharoff Posted on Mon Mar 03, 2008 at 10:51:24 AM EST
Hey look, everyone! We sure don't need that independent ethics office in the U.S. House when the existing ethics committee -- made up of members of the House -- police themselves so bravely.
They're launching a probe into the conduct of Rep. Rick Renzi! The efficiency is unparalleled! Oh, except Renzi is already under federal indictment and the Justice Department -- you know, the one that fired nine U.S. Attorneys for a reason I can't recall, yes THAT high-functioning Justice Department -- is already investigating Renzi.
In fact, the ethics panel will likely cede any further investigation to the feds. And the Renzi story and FBI investigation of his questionable land deal broke nearly a year ago.
But don't worry, members of the House! We still believe that you can police yourselves! Keep sticking this evidence in our face, and we'll surely realize the folly of trying to impose ethics on such a tough-on-crime bunch that acts with such speed and gumption.
UPDATE: Speaker Nancy Pelosi is pushing her caucus to act on ethics reform and today she sent this letter to Minority Leader John Boehner, saying that she plans to bring the issue to the House floor "soon." Our sources tell us that that should be interpreted as "this week." But before she'll do that, the House Democrats have to come around on an independent ethics office, along with enough House Republicans. Even if common sense and good governance are on our side in this fight, history is not. Anyone with a handset and dial tone should be calling their Representative today and telling them to step up and act on ethics reform to avoid looking ridiculous.
At least he kept it under 40
By Josh Zaharoff Posted on Mon Feb 25, 2008 at 03:49:56 PM EST
This week the House considers creating an independent ethics commission to monitor Members' behavior. The House is set to consider the creation of an independent ethics panel that supporters hope will restore credibility to efforts to police Congress internally.
The plan to allow people besides member of Congress to initiate inquiries into suspected wrongdoing by House members is a piece of unfinished business from Democratic efforts to overhaul ethics rules. It is also one of the most contentious, because lawmakers have traditionally resisted oversight by outsiders. Rep. Rick Renzi provides a timely example of why the commission is such a good idea.Representative Rick Renzi, Republican of Arizona, was indicted this week by a federal grand jury on 35 counts of corruption, including fraud, money laundering, extortion and other crimes, federal prosecutors said Friday.
Federal prosecutors said Mr. Renzi had sought to enrich himself and to finance his re-election campaigns in part by selling fraudulent insurance policies.
Farewell, Rick Renzi
By Kirstin Ellison Posted on Fri Aug 24, 2007 at 10:22:20 AM EST
Rep. Rick Renzi (R-AZ)
From Roll Call:
Rep. Rick Renzi (R-Ariz.) said Thursday in a statement obtained by Roll Call that he will not seek re-election in 2008, ending months of speculation regarding the ethically clouded Congressman's political future.
"I will not be seeking re-election to the U.S. House of Representatives in 2008. I am honored and thankful to serve Arizona's first district and appreciate all that we have accomplished together over the past 6 years."
One would hope that the voters would have thrown him out of Congress anyways; nevertheless, this is a smart decision on his part, unlike all those other decisions that got him into hot water in the first place.
UPDATE: Here's a non-subscription link.
Rick Renzi may retire
By Kirstin Ellison Posted on Fri Aug 03, 2007 at 05:15:02 PM EST
Rep. Rick Renzi (R-AZ)
Rep. Rick Renzi (R-AZ) has kept pretty quiet about his future reelection plans in the face of a federal corruption investigation into a shady land deal and increasingly stiff electoral competition.
But yesterday he indicated to Roll Call that he's considering whether or not to run again, and in fact appears to be leaning towards not running for a fourth term. Judge the following comment for yourself.
"To be honest, I was never going to be here a great while," Renzi told Roll Call. "I'm a businessman at heart."
Yeah, well, it's his business ventures while in office that have netted him a federal inquiry and a whole slew of 2008 challengers. He'd have a tough time getting reelected, anyways - he says he still hasn't made up his mind, but it's hardly a difficult choice.
Sen. John Kyl took issue with a US attorney firing
By Kirstin Ellison Posted on Fri Aug 03, 2007 at 04:38:40 PM EST
Documents recently rleased by the House Judiciary Committee show that Sen. John Kyl (R-AZ) disagreed with the Bush administration's decision to fire the US attorney from his state, Paul Charlton.
The latest e-mails refer to Kyl, who was a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and was notified by the administration about the plan to force Charlton out. Though one message released in the spring characterized Kyl as "fine" with the plan, he has always maintained that he opposed it. Wednesday's batch of e-mails supports that.
"I understand that Kyl is significantly disturbed over the Charlton issue," Rebecca Seidel, a deputy assistant attorney general, wrote to several other top Justice Department officials. "We need to ensure that (Attorney General Alberto Gonzales) is adequately prepared to deal with a question over the firings of the (U.S. attorneys)....I am hoping that Kyl would not bring it up in an open hearing."...
..."Kyl was not at all pleased with the way the Justice Department conducted its dismissal of several U.S. attorneys, including Paul Charlton from Arizona. Kyl supported Mr. Charlton's nomination," said the spokesman, Andrew Wilder. "And when informed of the department's decision to dismiss him, Kyl requested that the Justice Department reconsider its decision."
Perhaps Sen. Kyl thought that firing Charlton because he was investigating Rep. Rick Renzi (R-AZ) wasn't justified? Pity the Attorney General didn't see it that way.
Hey, Senate: Git-R-Dun on Ethics Reform!
By James Benton Posted on Wed Aug 01, 2007 at 01:26:54 PM EST
The Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007, also known as S. 1, or the ethics and lobbying reform bill, is not everything we had hoped it to be. And it's nowhere near what we'd like it to be despite its lofty title and low number.
That's all right.
If the Senate gives its approval to S. 1 this week, as it's expected to do, Congress will finally have produced tighter ethics and lobbying rules after being dragged through the mud of the Abramoff, Foley, Ney and Cunningham scandals of years past. And we'll soon be reminded of why we went to this trouble, when Rep. William Jefferson, D-LA, goes to trial.
Ethics Changes Remain Stuck - For Now
By James Benton Posted on Wed Jul 25, 2007 at 10:11:58 AM EST
People often say that Congress only makes big changes when faced with consensus or crisis. This must be the reason why we have no progress to report today on ethics reforms.
Apparently, there's no consensus to produce an ethics and lobbying reform bill or a revamped House ethics process. And there must not be a crisis -- notwithstanding the recent indictment of Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) ongoing federal investigations involving Reps. Rick Renzi (R-AZ) and John Doolittle (R-CA) and the recent news that Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) had been hanging out with alleged prostitutes. Nah, just business as usual on the Hill.
But as members have the aroma of jet fumes dancing in their heads -- the month-long August recess is approaching -- there may be a new ethics and lobbying reform bill in the next two weeks.
Renzi also hurting for campaign funds
By Kirstin Ellison Posted on Wed Jul 18, 2007 at 01:03:16 PM EST
John Doolittle isn't the only embattled House Republican finding fundraising a little tough this go 'round. Arizona Rep. Rick Renzi, under investigation by the FBI for a shady land deal, saw significant drops in his fundraising totals this quarter.
Renzi, whose family business was raided by the FBI last April, ended the last quarter with $20,418 in the bank, according to campaign finance reports covering April 1-June 30. That is just one-quarter of the $80,000 he had on hand at the end of the first three months of the year.
He raised $41,664 during the quarter, a fraction of the $300,000 he raised during the same period in the last election cycle.
The report, filed Sunday with the Federal Election Commission, showed Renzi has spent $126,388 and owes $456,024.
Speculation that Renzi won't seek re-election is perhaps even stronger than for Doolittle, and this information certainly makes it apparent that any re-election bid for Renzi would be a challenge.
|