Common Cause - Holding Power ResponsibleCommon Cause - Holding Power Responsible

Topics
Our Issues
Money in Politics
Election Reform
Media and Democracy
Ethics in Government
Government Accountability
Press Center
Research Center
Register to Vote

Sign Up and join the Community - click here

red arrow Common Blog

Texas Congressional Maps Redrawn

On Friday, a three-judge federal panel redrew several Texas Congressional districts after a long partisan battle with Election Day implications.  The Supreme Court declared the existing map, redrawn in 2003 by the Republican controlled state Legislature, unconstitutional because it significantly weakened Hispanic strength in the 23rd Congressional District - a violation of section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

The expansive 23rd District currently stretches from El Paso County in the West to parts of Webb and Bexar (San Antonio) Counties in the South.  Under the new plans, Webb County has been moved entirely into the 28th District, and Kerr, Kendall, Bandera, and Real Counties have been added to the 21st District.

Additionally, several solidly Hispanic neighborhoods in southern Bexar Country have been added to the 23rd District.  Hispanics will constitute 61 percent of the voting-age population in the revised 23rd District, a 10 percent increase from the 2004 figure.

"These changes restore Latino voting strength to District 23 without dividing communities of interest," said the judges, Lee H. Rosenthal, T. John Ward and Patrick E. Higginbotham of Federal District Court.

For more information about Friday's decision, check out the panel's ruling and the new map (pdf).

General News :: Entry Link :: Comment
Tags: Texas, Redistricting, Voting Rights Act, Supreme Court, In the States (all tags)

DOJ Sues MA City over Unequal Voter Access

The Massachusetts Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice has sued the city of Springfield for denying minority groups equal opportunities to cast votes.  The lawsuit claims that:

... poll workers failed to provide Spanish-language assistance to voters, treated Spanish speakers with hostility and would not let them receive translation assistance from people who accompanied them to the polls.

The lawsuit hinges upon several recently extended provisions of the Voting Rights Act that, inter alia, provide for language assistance in jurisdictions with significant minority populations.  If true, the case demonstrates that voting rights injustices need not be confined to Southern states.  It's a national problem.

General News :: Entry Link :: 1 Comment
Tags: Springfield, Massachusetts, Voting Rights Act, Voting Rights, In the States (all tags)

Why the VRA Renewal Moved So Quickly

As you may already know, President Bush today signed into law the bill that keeps the expiring portions of the Voting Rights Act on the books for another 25 years.

But what's been more surprising has been the speed with which the bill moved through the Senate last week. That story illustrates how Congress can do amazing things in an election year.

Click "Read More" for the rest...
General News :: Entry Link :: Read More :: Comment
Tags: President Bush, Height, Brazile, Morial, Hans von Spakovsky, Patrick Leahy, Orrin Hatch, Arlen Specter, Jeff Sessions, Bill Frist, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Voting Rights Act, VRA, civil rights (all tags)

President Bush signs Voting Rights Act extension

After all these months of pushing, then the last minute worries that certain obstructionists on the Hill would block it, we've finally reached our goal.  Today President Bush, surrounded by a large group of civil rights and congressional leaders, signed the Voting Rights Act extension, protecting its provisions for another 25 years.

Thanks to President Bush for seeing this legislation through, and thanks to all the Common Cause activists out there who answered our calls to write, phone, email, and shout at your legislators to make this happen.

General News :: Entry Link :: Comment
Tags: Voting Rights Act, VRA, civil rights, Pres. Bush (all tags)

Much Work Remains on the Voting Rights Act

If you look at the surface of last week's overwhelming vote by the House in favor of extending the protections of the Voting Rights Act, you would think that everything was all right.  Despite the presence of four amendments that would weaken the act, the House actually got a higher number of members to support reauthorization this time around (390) than it did 24 years ago (389).  Even today's Roll Call signaled an easier time in the Senate:  "VRA Moves Into Calmer Waters
Senators Expect Smooth Sailing," the headline over today's story read.

But then consider this: The House vote flew in the face of Speaker Dennis Hastert's plan to move only legislation supported by a majority of the 230-member House Republican caucus. It's true that a majority of both parties voted to pass the bill, but a majority of Republicans supported each of the amendments that would have seriously damaged, if not gutted, the Voting Rights Act. Only a strong showing of House Democrats' discipline kept the amendments out of the bill.

Click "Read More" for the rest...
General News :: Entry Link :: Read More :: 2 Comments
Tags: Roll Call, immigration, Jeff Sessions, John Cornyn, Tom Coburn, Bill Frist, Washington Post, J. Dennis Hastert, Patrick McHenry, Voting Rights Act (all tags)

Protect the VRA

Update: The House passed HR 9 by a vote of 390-33.

The House is scheduled to vote today on HR 9, legislation renewing and strengthening the landmark Voting Rights Act  Rep.

Voting Rights Act of 1965 played a major role in protecting the voting rights of African-Americans, Latinos and people who are not fully proficient in English.  Many credit the act as the most effective civil rights bill enacted in American history.

Call your representative NOW at (202) 224-3121. Tell your representative:  I urge you to fully support H.R. 9 and oppose any harmful amendments.

General News :: Entry Link :: 2 Comments
Tags: VRA, civil rights, voting, elections, house of representatives, voting rights act (all tags)

Voting Rights Stalled

Update: Now we're hearing the bill, HR 9, is scheduled for the House floor next week. It's urgent to get calls into the House to tell your Representative to vote for the bill.

The Voting Rights Act has been stalled in Congress by lawmakers unwilling to acknowledge that voter discrimination and voter suppression still exist. Millions of voters, or potential voters, are prevented or discouraged from voting. We need to renew and strengthen the Voting Rights Act. Sign our petition to push Congress to act now.

Here's an excerpt from an op-ed in today's NY Times by the daughters of President Lyndon Johnson, who signed the original, groundbreaking Voting Rights Act of 1965:

By LUCI BAINES JOHNSON and LYNDA JOHNSON ROBB

The Voting Rights Act, signed into law on Aug. 6, 1965, by our father, President Lyndon Johnson, opened the political process to millions of Americans. The law was born amid the struggle for voting rights in Selma and Montgomery, Ala., which the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. called "a shining moment in the conscience of man." By eliminating barriers, including poll taxes and literacy tests, that had long prevented members of minority groups from voting, the act became a keystone of civil rights in the United States.

Now, crucial provisions of this legislation are in jeopardy. Last month, Congress seemed set to renew expiring sections intended to prevent voter discrimination based on race or language proficiency. Instead, a group of House lawmakers opposed to those sections succeeded in derailing their consideration.

General News :: Entry Link :: 1 Comment
Tags: Voting Rights Act, Congress, House (all tags)

How to put your foot in your mouth in Texas

Being from Texas myself, I know firsthand some of the downright silly things that can come out of peoples' mouths down there.  However, this editorial from the University of Texas-Austin newspaper highlighting some choice quotes from Representative John Carter (R-TX) regarding his opposition to renewing the Voting Rights Act left even me with my jaw on the floor.

The particulars of Carter's objection to the bill were overshadowed by his verbiage, especially when he said, "I simply believe you should be able to read, write and speak English to be a voter in the United States."

Oops! The VRA was passed in part to stop racists from administering literacy tests at the polls designed to block minority voter access. It also mandated that jurisdictions that contain enough people with limited English skills print their ballots in other languages.

Why would Carter endorse a literacy test in the light of such an embarrassing historical record? You see, he also said, "I don't think we have racial bias in Texas anymore."

As much as we'd all love for Representative Pollyanna to be correct in his proclamation of a color-blind Lone Star State, the facts say otherwise. According to a report by the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, Texas has had the second highest number of objections filed under the VRA since 1982, behind only Mississippi.

Technorati Profile

Click "Read More" for the rest...
General News :: Entry Link :: Read More :: Comment
Tags: Texas, Voting Rights Act, VRA, Rep. John Carter, literacy tests, civil rights (all tags)


State Issues
RSS Feeds
contact us | volunteer/intern programs | employment opportunities | site map | privacy policy