ByDerek Cressman Posted on Tue Jan 15, 2008 at 07:41:37 PM EST
I was in Reno, Nevada yesterday with former Nevada Common Cause Board Chair Jim Hulse and a group of activists who were calling on Senator Jim Ensign to explain his obstruction of a bill to require U.S. Senators to tell us who they are taking money from -- now.
Watch a video of our event:
Currently, Senators file campaign finance disclosure reports on paper. The paper reports are scanned into a computer, printed out, and then retyped to be placed on the Federal Election Commission website. This process takes about four months and costs about $250,000 in taxpayer dollars.
Still, it seems no Republican wants to fess up to placing the nearly monthlong hold on a bill that would make it easier for the public and the media to access Senate campaign finance reports, which currently are filed on paper, unlike House reports, which must be filed electronically.
Curiously, the nonpartisan Sunlight Foundation, along with help from some other watchdog groups and liberal blogs, last month got constituents and other concerned citizens to ask all 100 Senators whether they were the one with a hold on the bill. The unanimous answer was, "Not me."
Which leads to the question: Who's been lying?
"It's hard for me to imagine that a Senator lied outright to a constituent, but it's not hard for me to imagine that a Senator would play word games," said Sunlight Foundation Executive Director Ellen Miller, whose group has had success in the past at ferreting out anonymous holders.
Word games have no place in a discussion of openness and accountability. It's time for Senator Anonymous to either explain his or her objection to the bill, or to lift the secret hold.
ByKirstin Ellison Posted on Wed May 02, 2007 at 04:28:07 PM EST
The electronic disclosure bill sponsored by Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI) is still being held up by some anonymous Republican Senator who placed a secret hold.
Everyone has long lost patience with this "Senator Anonymous" - and Roll Call tells us in an editorial today where we should direct our attention and frustration:
It should be brought to bear on the entire Senate, but especially its Republican leadership, which did nothing about the ridiculous, expensive and anachronistic practice of paper filing for the most recent four years that it was in the majority and now is failing to use its persuasive power on the Senator or Senators blocking the bill.
Republicans presume to be the party of efficient government and fiscal responsibility, yet the Senate filing system is a mockery of both principles. It requires transferring mostly electronic contribution and expenditure reports compiled by campaigns onto paper for delivery to the Secretary of the Senate, whose office then scans each page — more than 10,000 total pages last year — back into digital form to send to the Federal Election Commission, which then takes 11 hours to print them all out on paper again for shipment to a private contractor that re-keys them into a digital format at a cost of $250,000.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) is the only one we can be sure knows who placed the secret hold (besides the guilty party). The hold is preventing the bill from passing with unanimous consent, a procedural tool that would allow the bill (which is co-sponsored by 21 Democrats, 15 Republicans, and two independents) to pass without debate.
ByKirstin Ellison Posted on Fri Apr 27, 2007 at 01:11:49 PM EST
Yesterday Senators Feinstein (D-CA) and Feingold (D-WI) again took their electronic-disclosure bill to the floor for unanimous consent. And again, it was stopped cold by an "objection" on behalf of an anonymous Republican Senator. The Washington Post speaks for most of us, I'm sure, when it calls out this behavior on today's editorial pages:
And just as he or she did on April 17, Sen. Ima Luddite (R-Who Knows Where) voiced opposition. This time the mouthpiece was Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.). "On behalf of the Republican side," he said, "I object." We object to the obstruction.
Honestly, what is the big deal here? Filing campaign finance reports electronically has been standard operating procedure for candidates for the House of Representatives and the White House for years -- as it has been for political parties, political action committees and "527" groups. Yet Senate candidates are still trudging down to the Senate Office of Public Records with paper copies of their reports, which are then passed along to the Federal Election Commission, which sends them to a vendor that punches in the information and zaps it back to the FEC electronically. That finally makes them widely available, sometimes too late for voters to see who's donating to whom and how the money is being spent. With this seeming fear of modernity, it's a wonder the Senate isn't calculating budgets with an abacus. Or is it a fear of disclosure?
Long-standing Senate custom allows the objection of a single senator to stop a bill in its tracks -- it's known as a secret hold. A measure that passed the Senate earlier this year, and awaits a House vote, would eliminate the practice.
ByKirstin Ellison Posted on Wed Apr 25, 2007 at 12:39:35 PM EST
Here's a story for you: there's legislation in the Senate requiring Senators to file their campaign finance disclosure forms online. The House already does this, so it's not groundbreaking territory - it's a simple reform that would be easy enough to implement and is long overdue. In fact, there's overwhelming support for the legislation among Senators. So why hasn't this legislation passed yet?
Some anonymous Senator has placed a secret hold on it. Seriously. And woe to the legislator in question when his or her identity is eventually discovered...and the activists will discover it:
The objection -- a long-standing Senate custom that allows a single unnamed member to stop any bill in its tracks -- unleashed a vigorous response from bloggers, led by the Sunlight Foundation. The group called on its members to dial their senators and ask if they put the hold on the bill.
Over the past week, the Sunlight Foundation continued to update its list, crossing off names as its members obtained denials. Yesterday morning, they were down to two -- Republican Sens. Jon Kyl (Ariz.) and Judd Gregg (N.H.).
By the end of the day yesterday, however, both Kyl and Gregg had issued denials. So does that mean someone lied? Stay tuned to the Sunlight Foundation for the latest updates about this.
Common Blog
