Texas to consider bipartisan redistricting?
By Kirstin Ellison Posted on Fri Apr 27, 2007 at 05:27:52 PM EST
Forgive me if today's posts seem rather Texas-centric - there was a lot of good stuff coming out of the Lonestar State's newspapers today! Also, I'm from Texas, and no one's stopping me.
From Dave McNeely of the Midland Reporter-Telegram, an excellent review of the redistricting mess Texas made headlines with, and also the potential for a bipartisan redistricting commission.
Redistricting by the Texas Legislature is seldom pretty.
But the massacre in congressional districting in 2003, besides being unnecessary, had all the subtlety of a multiple ax murder.
Sen. Jeff Wentworth, R-San Antonio, has been trying to put the chore of at least congressional redistricting with a bipartisan commission of non-elected officials since 1993. About a dozen other states have at least some of their redistricting performed by some body other than their legislature.
Wentworth says Texas doing so could save Texans millions of dollars in legal fees and costs of unnecessary legislative sessions, and avoid enormously bloody infighting that is a constant by-product of partisan redistricting.
The article spells out the obstacles, but it does seem like there's hope that Wentworth and his supportive colleagues (yes, there are a bunch of them) may eventually get their way. Here's hoping they do!
Read John Kelso's column
By Kirstin Ellison Posted on Fri Apr 27, 2007 at 05:13:50 PM EST
John Kelso, popular columnist at the Austin American-Statesman, has a piece today that absolutely rips to shreds plans in the Texas statehouse to implement voter ID restrictions. A taste:
One good thing about Rep. Betty Brown's bill on the kind of ID voters should be required to bring to the polls with them?
Since her provision would cut down on voter turnout, it would free up parking at the polls.
Then again, so would a chicken flu epidemic.
Now go read the rest.
Lobbying on liquor law lines Lonestar legislators' pockets
By Kirstin Ellison Posted on Fri Jan 26, 2007 at 03:08:07 PM EST
Alliteration aside, there's a turf war brewing in Texas, and industry PAC contributions have placed lawmakers smack in the middle of it.
Liquor wholesalers dumped nearly $1.7 million on Texas lawmakers in the weeks leading up to the 2007 Legislature while pushing for changes that would allow them to sell booze directly to restaurants and bars.
The law now allows only package liquor stores - not wholesalers - to supply establishments where patrons drink on the premises. Wholesalers say that's not fair; package stores say giant wholesalers would undercut their prices to monopolize the market, potentially costing thousands of people their jobs.
That's the gist of the situation - now here's the interesting part. That $1.7 million in the last ten weeks is five times more than what was spent in the entire previous year. And the recipients were of that money should come as no shock - just about everyone in a position of influence.
"It shows that in Texas, we have a pay-to-play system," said Suzy Woodford of Common Cause Texas, which tracks ethics in government. "We have no limits on the amount of money that these individuals, their PACs and their officers can contribute. So it clearly demonstrates to the average Joe that if you don't have the big bucks ... the item you care about is not even going to be considered."
It's an interesting article that breaks down the issue and the law in question. A list of the top campaign contribution recipients from the wholesalers follows after the jump.
DeLay's redistricting plan doesn't quite produce expected results
By Kirstin Ellison Posted on Thu Dec 14, 2006 at 12:20:01 PM EST
Democrats picked up a 30th House seat this week, and once again, it's all Tom DeLay's fault. This time, though, it's more than just his long list of scandals dragging down the Republican Party. This time, his direct actions may have cost the GOP the seat.
On Tuesday, former Representative Ciro Rodriguez (who'd lost his seat due to DeLay's mid-decade redistricting) narrowly beat incumbent Rep. Henry Bonilla in a runoff election, largely due to the redistricting that changed voter demographics. It was an unexpected win, and it certainly adds insult to injury to the disgraced DeLay.
The former congressman from Texas was the mastermind of a 2003 redrawing of congressional lines in the state that led to the removal of six House Democrats in the 2004 elections.
Two years later, DeLay's fortunes have suffered a near-total reversal, as the redistricting map that once seemed certain to cement his legacy and GOP majorities for years has instead led to the end of that career and may well be a building block for a reenergized Democratic Party in the state.
To those in the reform community who were dismayed to see the redistricting process being abused for partisan gain at the expense of fairness to voters, this is the cherry on top of the DeLay disgrace sundae.
Texas Congressional Maps Redrawn
By Zach Proulx Posted on Mon Aug 07, 2006 at 02:02:08 PM EST
On Friday, a three-judge federal panel redrew several Texas Congressional districts after a long partisan battle with Election Day implications. The Supreme Court declared the existing map, redrawn in 2003 by the Republican controlled state Legislature, unconstitutional because it significantly weakened Hispanic strength in the 23rd Congressional District - a violation of section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
The expansive 23rd District currently stretches from El Paso County in the West to parts of Webb and Bexar (San Antonio) Counties in the South. Under the new plans, Webb County has been moved entirely into the 28th District, and Kerr, Kendall, Bandera, and Real Counties have been added to the 21st District.
Additionally, several solidly Hispanic neighborhoods in southern Bexar Country have been added to the 23rd District. Hispanics will constitute 61 percent of the voting-age population in the revised 23rd District, a 10 percent increase from the 2004 figure.
"These changes restore Latino voting strength to District 23 without dividing communities of interest," said the judges, Lee H. Rosenthal, T. John Ward and Patrick E. Higginbotham of Federal District Court.
For more information about Friday's decision, check out the panel's ruling and the new map (pdf).
State Round-Up
By Kirstin Ellison Posted on Fri Jul 21, 2006 at 04:59:54 PM EST
Gather 'round for your weekly one-stop-shop for state news and happenings.
Tex Mess
By Kirstin Ellison Posted on Tue Jul 18, 2006 at 01:24:50 PM EST
No one saw this coming, right?
Republicans, Democrats and Hispanic rights groups in Texas unveiled competing plans on Friday to rapidly redraw several of the state's Congressional districts. It was the opening salvo in what promises to be a short, fierce battle to reconfigure the political geometry of South Texas.
The United States Supreme Court last month upheld most of the 2003 Republican-led redistricting plan in Texas, but ordered the state to bring the 23rd Congressional District in South and West Texas in line with the Voting Rights Act by adding more Hispanic voters.
There are proposed plans from Republicans, Democrats, interest groups, minority coalitions, Representatives, Attorney Generals, and who knows who else will decide to get in on the fun, as politicians try to draw their opponents out of districts and insure their own reelection and minority groups try to protect their own interests. A three-judge panel will hear arguments on August 3. We'll keep you updated on how this mess gets sorted out.
A Chance to Highlight Redistricting Reform
By Stephen Steigleder Posted on Mon Jul 10, 2006 at 09:06:43 AM EST
The Supreme Court's decision to uphold Tom Delay's gerrymandering of Texas is a window of opportunity for reformers.
The case, League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry, has brought exposure that money simply can't buy. Nonpartisan organizations finally have an audience for their message that self-serving redistricting plans inflict irreparable harm on our political system. An effective national campaign could ignite a backlash of legislation from states that want to avoid the bitter partisan battle witnessed in Texas.
There is recent precedent for a state backlash. Last year, in Kelo v. City of New London, the Supreme Court declared that local governments had the right to seize private property for economic development. The national outcry resulted in state legislatures specifically banning the use of eminent domain for economic purposes.
|