Latest polls from Ohio and our radio ads.
By Murshed Zaheed Posted on Mon Nov 07, 2005 at 03:08:24 PM EST
Here are the latest polls from Ohio on issues 2, 3, 4 and 5 via the Columbus Dispatch: Issue 2 (Early Voting) 59%Y 33%N 9% undecided
Issue 3 (Campaign Finance Reform) 61%Y 25%N 14% undecided
Issue 4 (Redistricting Reform) 31% Y 45% N 25% undecided
Issue 5 (Indep. Election Board) 41% Y 43% N 16% undecided This is good news. Looks like 2 and 3 are up big. Issue 5 is a dead heat, and just note the number of undecided on Issue 4. So it all looks good at this point of time. Let's hope the momentum of our ground and air campaign will get us over the hump. Speaking of momentum, it is definitely on the side of reformers in Ohio. Lisa isn't blogging today ... but she just emailed me about how thousands of volunteers are going all around Ohio today, canvassing, going door to door, and calling thousands of Buckeye residents rallying them to come out and vote. We also have two radio ads. running right now through out. You can listen to them by clicking here and here (both mp3 files). So, we are doing everything we can on air and on the ground. Less than 24 hours to go till we reform Ohio.
The Trojan Horse in Ohio ...
By Murshed Zaheed Posted on Wed Nov 02, 2005 at 01:08:06 PM EST
No this post is not about how the USC football team football team would fair against the Ohio State Buckeyes. We are talking about how big money has corrupted Ohio's political scandal over the years. Lisa wrote on Tuesday how one of the key reform measures ( Issue 3) we are campaigning for in Ohio, will go a long way in simmering down the pay-to-play political culture of Ohio. Well today to demonstrate the urgency for this reform, Common Cause Ohio came out with a report titled, The Trojan Horse: Early Campaign Finance Reports Show That Ohio's New Campaign Finance Law Has Opened the Floodgates to Big Money. As the title of the report indicates, it zeroes in on the effect (or total lack thereof) of a campaign finance legislation, the Ohio state lawmakers rammed through their state legislature in late 2004. Basically the law sent the campaign fundraising in Ohio through the roof. Here is an excerpt from the report (PDF file): According to an analysis of campaign finance data downloaded from the website of the Ohio Secretary of State, Ohio state candidates have raised a total $6.9 million in individual and PAC donations in the first six months of 2005. This includes candidates for statewide races, such as governor and attorney general, as well as the state assembly. Candidates raised only $3.4 million during the same period in 2003 and only $2.7 million in 2001. While the highly competitive gubernatorial race partially explains this increase, $1.8 million of the money raised in 2005 was from donations greater than $2,500 - contributions that could not have been made directly to candidates before the new campaign finance law went into effect on March 31. Of the $1.8 million raised from large donors, $750,000 was made by 75 big contributors "maxing-out" with $10,000 contributions.
The candidates vying for the governor's seat have benefited the most from the new contribution limits. Secretary of State and Republican gubernatorial candidate Kenneth Blackwell led all candidates by raising $548,350 in contributions greater than $2,500 during the first six months of 2005. (Blackwell also was one of the leading proponents of the new campaign finance bill.) The five gubernatorial candidates (three Republicans and two Democrats) have raised $1.4 million in contributions in excess of $2,500 during the first six months of 2005. The legislative leadership also benefited during the same period. Senate President Bill Harris (R) raised $58,000 in contributions of more than $2,500, while House Speaker Jon Husted (R) raised $44,500 in donations of more than $2,500. Yeap, big money is out of control in Ohio. And of course it's the influence of big money and out of control political fundraising, which has been source of some of unprecedented scandals in this key state, leading to indictments of figures like Tom Noe. This is one of main reasons we are fighting so hard to pass issue 3, along with issue 2 ( early voting), 4 ( independent redistricting), and 5 ( independent election administration), which will go a long way in cleaning up the systematic political corruption in that state. So, again if you are reading this from Ohio, come out and join our campaign to reform Ohio. And if you can volunteer for us on the ground, then help us by making a contribution and ask your family and friends to support our efforts too. Just 6 more days to go till we clean up Ohio.
Had enough of corruption? Come out and work for positive changes in Ohio
By Murshed Zaheed Posted on Fri Oct 28, 2005 at 01:40:08 PM EST
On a day of indictment mania want to end on a positive note, focusing on the incredible energy and work our members, supporters, and friends are doing in Ohio. They are grinding away to bring about political change to clean up its society of political scandals. Mike wrote about indictment of Tom Noe, the infamous coingate dealer, political fundraiser, who was one of the pillars in Ohio's society of political scandal. Not a stretch to say Noe was in many ways the Jack Abramoff of Ohio. Also, Mike also wrote on Wednesday about how our opponents in Ohio have turned the campaign trail for the upcoming November 8 elections into an ugly mess. The ad was a perfect example of why we need to push for the positive reforms in Ohio, which will go a long way in cleaning up the political corruption in Ohio. And our activists are right on it, as they are out campaigning all over the state. They are being relentless, and they have a whole list of campaign events and organizing activities planned all over the state. Below after the jump are many of the activities planned for the weekend - WE NEED MORE PEOPLE to sign up for these events across the state - call your regional organizer listed beneath each region. Just click on "read more" to see more details. You can also check out this ReformOhioNow website for a regional contact map for the entire state. And of course if you cannot come out and volunteer on the ground in Ohio, you can always boost this campaign by making a contribution to our efforts today. And, if you know anyone else who would be interested in supporting our campaign in Ohio, please use our action center to email your friends and family, and let them know about our efforts to restore integrity in the democractic proess in Ohio.
Last chance for reform in Connecticut?
By Murshed Zaheed Posted on Wed Oct 26, 2005 at 02:47:34 PM EST
While we are pushing for positive reforms to change the political culture of Ohio our members are not letting up in Connecticut. Yesterday, the Hartford Courant came through with another great editorial on the need for campaign finance reform in that corruption ridden state: Lawmakers have also promised to take up their least favorite issue: campaign finance reform. But they haven't promised to take the critical step of actually passing a strong reform bill to replace corrosive special interest money with clean public funds. Legislators are addicted to contributions from lobbyists, their clients, state contractors and businesses through the ad book loophole. That money fuels their campaigns. And having taken the money, the elected officials are beholden to the givers.
It's part and parcel of a culture of corruption in Connecticut politics that has sent a former governor, a former state treasurer, big-city mayors and other politicians to prison.
It's well past time to change the way campaigns are financed. Having dallied over the subject all through this year's regular session and having failed to produce reform, legislators must make the change now, in the special session, regardless of how many other items are on the agenda. Delay will kill any chance of meaningful change. We couldn't agree more. Members, volunteers, and activists from Common Cause Connecticut and other coalition organizations are staying on these lawmakers trails, leafleting, phone banking and canvassing in support of clean elections. I took part in these organizing activities myself last week in Hartford, as did my colleague DJ, yes here, wearing a milk carton on Hartford streets in support of campaign finance reform (just click on the image to enlarge it):  He sure got everyone's attention. And if you are in Connecticut today make a phone call to your lawmakers in Hartford today. Get their attention and ask them to not drop the ball on clean elections reform in Connecticut.
Don't let corruption become an "entertainment" in CT
By Murshed Zaheed Posted on Thu Oct 20, 2005 at 05:10:19 PM EST
Just checked into Connecticut last night with my colleagues at Common Cause Connecticut, who are working hard with other coaliton partners like Public Campaign and Connecticut Citzen Action Group, to bring about publicly financed campaigns in this state. There is lot to do. I will be heading over the CCAG headquarters in a bit to help them phonebanking, flyering, whatever organzing activities they have planned to push for Clean Elections. As we have mentioned here before, this is a pivotal time in Hartford. Lot of activities in the State Capitol, as lawmakers are figuring out how to come up with a clean elections bill. If you need any indication on how the state residents feel about the corruption, that has plagued Connecticut during last few years, here is a taste:

And, also check out this letter from Bruce Burchsted from Meriden, which appeared in the Hartford Courant today Might campaign finance reform be un-American?
This country has enjoyed a rich history of political corruption from the beginning. Consider Alexander Hamilton, one of our founding fathers. His insider trading while he was Treasury secretary gave citizens of the time a great deal of amusement.
Fast-forward to former Gov. John Rowland. His contractor friends contributed to his cause for mere favors. Yet the resulting scandals have provided the public with enormous amounts of entertainment. The hot tub caper alone kept us rolling in the aisles for months.
It's possible that Rowland would not have erred so if he had campaigned with public financing. But what a loss we would have suffered without our daily scandal fix.
We entertainment-demanding Americans might not even be aware of governors, legislators, and prosecutors without the aid of public scandals to bring these things to our attention. The billions of dollars that corruption costs the taxpayers is a small price for this educational experience.
So, "Bah!" I say to campaign finance reform. For the entertainment and educational good of our citizens, keep those scandals coming. It's the American way - or is it? So, yeah ... Connecticans are sick and tired of the rampant corruption in that state. It has become a sad joke. And publicly financed campaign legislation is once positive solution that can go a long way in cleaning up this corruption and make a dent in this kind of cynicism in the state. So, if you are in Connecticut, help us out today. Please do not let your lawmakers hem and haw again with Clean Elections. Don't let them finish this year without agreeing on Clean Elections. Call them today so they can get this done. Even if their office says the legislator is in favor of Clean Elections, or that they voted for it during the regular session, do not let them pass the buck. It will take a compromise during the coming special session from all - Democrats and Republicans, the legislature and the governor - but it will only happen with your help.
Demand an Investigation of Senator Frist
By Murshed Zaheed Posted on Wed Oct 19, 2005 at 01:55:02 PM EST
So far we have written two letters to the Senate Ethics Committee requesting an investigation of Senator Bill Frist's sale of HCA, Inc. stock from his so-called "blind" trust. We haven't gotten any response from them yet. The Securities and Exchange Commission is already investigating whether Frist is guilty of insider trading because his family started HCA and his brother sits on the board of directors. So we need your help in convincing the leaders Senate Ethics Committee to investigate the sale of Senator Bill Frist's stock in his family's company.
Call their offices and demand that the Ethics Committee investigate Senator Frist's stock sales: - Senator George Voinovich (R-OH)
Chairman, Senate Ethics Committee 202-224-3353 or 202-224-2981
- Senator Tim Johnson (D-SD)
Ranking Member, Senate Ethics Committee 202-224-5842
Again to recap, according to the Ethics Committee , a "blind" trust means that there shall be no "direct or indirect communication" between senators and trustees unless the senator is directing the trustee "to sell all of an asset . . . [which] creates a conflict of interest ... due to the subsequent assumption of duties " by the senator.
The concern about conflict of interest about Senator's Frist stock sales is pretty apparent. First, there appears to be "direct or indirect communication" between Senator Frist and his trustees concerning the contents of the blind trusts. Senate records show that trustees for Senator Frist and members of his family wrote the senator nearly two dozen times between 2001 and July 2005, about transfers of assets to his blind trusts and sales of assets. This does not sound like a "blind" trust.
And, what are Senator Frist's "subsequent assumption of duties?" He has been the majority leader in the Senate for three years. A spokesperson for Senator Frist has said that the sale was approved to avoid a conflict of interest because the senator is preparing to promote health care legislation. The problem with this argument, of course, is that Senator Frist has been promoting health care legislation for years, such as the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit bill in 2003, which he sponsored in the Senate.
So, clearly there is a legitimate concern that Senator Frist may have violated conflict of interest rules, which the Senate Ethics Committee needs to investigate today. So, please call the Senate leaders at the number above, and urge them to start a prompt and thorough investigate by the Ethics Committee into Senator Frist's stock sales. And, as always ask your family, friends, anyone else who wants to join our efforts to restore honor and integrity in our democratic institutions.
It is critical that the Senate Ethics Committee exercise effective oversight and enforcement of rules relating to the use of blind trusts in order to maintain public credibility and avoid conflicts of interest.
The politicization of Katrina "inquiries"
By Murshed Zaheed Posted on Tue Oct 18, 2005 at 09:41:01 AM EST
Three seperate overlapping investigations in Washington on Katrina is creating yet another partisan mess. Here is a report from the LA Times report, which includes comments from our Susannah Goodman: Instead, three separate, overlapping investigations are underway -- the one in the House, one in the Senate and one by the White House.
They are expected to produce three reports about missteps made by government officials -- and offer three sets of recommendations for fixing what went wrong.
And that, said Richard A. Falkenrath, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, a centrist think tank in Washington, is bad news for the nation.
"The thing that we might lose is an opportunity to get on a better trajectory in terms of preparing this country for catastrophic disasters," said Falkenrath, who served in the Bush administration's Homeland Security Department.
Other congressional observers and outside experts caution that none of the findings may be considered definitive, and could be contradictory.
"We felt strongly and still feel strongly that there should be an independent commission to investigate the poor cooperation and response to Katrina," said Susannah Goodman, senior legislative advocate for the watchdog group Common Cause.
"I think the process is very politicized, and that is extremely unfortunate."
Goodman added: "At the end of the day, what everybody wants is a set of recommendations that will fix the problems, that will tell us how we can be better prepared for the next disaster."
House and Senate members have cooperated before in conducting major inquiries, most recently following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
After public pressure, however, an independent commission also was set up to investigate the attacks. We are going to have to generate same kind of public pressure to establish an independent, nonpartisan commission to investigate government's response to this tragedy. Thousdands of activists have already signed our petition demanding an indepedent commission. If you haven't signed it yet, please sign it today, and pass it on to everyone you know.
Catch the Al Franken show this Monday ...
By Murshed Zaheed Posted on Sun Oct 16, 2005 at 06:46:25 PM EST
Thought you might like to know that Andy Sauer, our Executive Director of Common Cause Connecticut is scheduled to appear on Air America's Al Franken Show, Monday, October 17th at 12:30 pm. That is tomorrow. Please make sure to check your local listing for the time and channel of the show in your area. The topic of the interview will be our ongoing campaign to achieve Clean Elections in Connecticut. The interview will focus on the effect this would have on Connecticut politics and our strategy for making it happen. If you are listening to the interview, tell us what you think. We want to hear your impressions, and you can share your feedbacks and comments on our blog in real time while listening to the program
|