Citizens' Elections Program takes off in Connecticut
By Andy Sauer Posted on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 04:28:25 PM EST
Gov. M. Jodi Rell. (CT News Junkie)
The Connecticut Citizens' Election Program handed the first election grants to qualified candidates at a press conference Tuesday that included some of the state's most prominent elected officials. Gov. M. Jodi Rell, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, House Majority Leader Rep. Chris Donovan, Secretary of the State Susan Bysiewicz and many other officials were on hand to celebrate the arrival of the long-awaited campaign finance reform. "We expect that we will be changing the face of the elections in CT for good and yes forever. These reforms make Connecticut a national leader in electoral reforms and in fact I believe we are a model for the rest of the nation." So far, according to the State Elections Enforcement Commission, 145 candidates have opted into the program, though that number is expected to significantly increase in the coming weeks. CT News Junkie wrote: Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz said it's estimated that 70 to 80 percent of candidates will participate in public financing this year, which is historic when compared to Maine and Arizona where the participation rate was about 30 percent in the first year. She said a federal survey a few years ago found that over time both Maine and Arizona experienced significant increases in the amount of candidates contesting races in both primaries and general elections. And voter participation in these two states has risen about 10 percent since public financing was enacted, Bysiewicz noted. CT News Junkie, June 3, 2008
You can make a difference
By Andy Sauer Posted on Thu May 15, 2008 at 06:55:41 PM EST
Holding power accountable gets exhausting after awhile, doesn't it? I was at a recent event talking about the importance of voting and how important it is to encourage others to view voting more than annual chore but as a secular sacrament. The room was filled with the most diehard activists -- the kind that stand on town greens in any kind of weather to protest the war in Iraq and the kind groups like Common Cause depend on to push for reform. They were energetic and eager to the hit the streets in the name of democracy. Then, something happened.
Not entirely a "Do Nothing" session
By Andy Sauer Posted on Fri May 09, 2008 at 12:19:10 PM EST
It turns out a good defense does make a pretty good offense. The Connecticut Legislature wrapped up its 2008 session early Thursday morning. Although it was generally dubbed a "Do Nothing" session, Connecticut Common Cause was able to pass one essential bill and make sure a number of other bills aimed at either turning the clock on reform didn't head to the governor's desk. Sure, it's easier to kill a bill than push a bill, but in the crush of the final days of session it is always possible to sneak a rat into a marginally related bill. Connecticut Common Cause checked every bill passed by the Legislature. While we chuckled at "An Act Concerning Beer Cooler Accessibility," which passed both chambers unanimously, we found nothing that would chisel away at any hard-fought reforms. That said, there were a number of bills that didn't make the cut this year and a few that did. For a short session where only supposedly essential are to be called, it was a good year.
End of CT legislative session: The home stretch
By Andy Sauer Posted on Wed May 07, 2008 at 12:57:44 PM EST
The Connecticut Capitol
The Connecticut General Assembly concludes its 2008 legislative session at midnight tonight, and for the first time in a long time, Connecticut Common Cause is playing defense as opposed to trying to shoehorn a reform at the last minute (in 2006, a critical campaign finance reform bill passed in the last two minutes.) Bills that we were pushing for have either passed and been enacted into law, been tied down on the calendar with no hope of salvation or caught in internecine feuds between the House and Senate. Now, we have to make sure that the so-called "Do Nothing Session" does nothing to turn back the clock on important reforms.
ID Blues in CT: Update
By Andy Sauer Posted on Tue May 06, 2008 at 01:21:02 PM EST
So far, attempts by proponents of Voter Photo ID to spark a debate have been stymied by a lack of opportunities. The state Senate has one bill on the calendar that could be called for a debate but hasn't for several days. Other election related bills have been relegated to the foot of the calendar, which is the legislative word for Limbo. There was some scuttlebutt that the opponents of Voter Photo ID, pining to fight a good fight, might call an election bill, but it never happened. There's a lot of bills on the calendar and not a lot of time left. This is one time the clock is working in our favor. Keep the e-mails coming. Let's keep the pressure on until the Voter Photo ID threat is gone.
Now, all we can do is wait...
By Andy Sauer Posted on Mon May 05, 2008 at 11:37:19 AM EST
There's only three days left in the 2008 legislative session. Proponents of Voter Photo ID could float their amendment on any of those days, depending on whether or not the Senate or the House calls an elections bill. In the Connecticut General Assembly as opposed to Congress, for those following from out-of-state, in order for an amendment to be called and debated, it must be germane to the underlying bill. There are a few elections bill left on the calendar, but who knows when, let alone if, they might be called. All the more reason to keep the e-mails coming. I did a little research on the whole subject of voter fraud in Connecticut. It exists, but it is apparent that Voter Photo ID would do little to prevent it from occurring.
Badly drawn line
By Andy Sauer Posted on Fri May 02, 2008 at 05:38:08 PM EST
The Hartford Courant ran a story on a state ethics bill that would allow legislators to use staff attorneys should they ever become involved in an ethics complaint. Connecticut Common Cause weighed in, and as you might expect, we don't like it. ... the debate at the March 27 ethics panel meeting highlighted a need for "a clear and finite point" up to which taxpayer-funded representation is proper -- and the amendment "draws a line" there. But Common Cause's Sauer said that while he sympathizes with lawmakers' concerns about ethics while under constant scrutiny, "where they've drawn the line now, I don't think it's in the right place." The Hartford Courant, "Use of State Lawyers in Ethics Cases Backed" It's not that I don't think there's a place for staff attorneys to assist state and elected officials in ethical matters. Clearly, there is, especially when it comes to ethics compliance.
No debate on Voter Photo ID... yet
By Andy Sauer Posted on Thu May 01, 2008 at 07:18:12 PM EST
The Connecticut State Senate unanimously approved the 17-year-old primary voting rights bill. The expected Voter Photo ID amendment and debate never materialized. With the exception of a mini debate on an amendment that would put to state voters a proposal for referenda, the talk regarding the primary voting rights bill was friendly. Stronger words came outside the chamber immediately after the vote. Senate Minority Leader John McKinney said proponents of Voter Photo ID didn't raise the amendment on the primary voting rights bill because they supported the underlying legislation. He promised a debate on Voter Photo ID before the session ended.
|